JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zvomuya, F.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zvomuya, F.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zvomuya, F.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Potato
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Nitrogen
Journal of Environmental Quality 32:480-489 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Ground Water Quality

Nitrate Leaching and Nitrogen Recovery Following Application of Polyolefin-Coated Urea to Potato

Francis Zvomuya, Carl J. Rosen*, Michael P. Russelle and Satish C. Gupta

USDA-ARS, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, Room 439, St. Paul, MN 55108-6028

* Corresponding author (crosen{at}soils.umn.edu)

Received for publication February 11, 2002. High N fertilizer and irrigation amounts applied to potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) on coarse-textured soils often result in nitrate (NO3) leaching and low recovery of applied fertilizer N. This 3-yr study compared the effects of two rates (140 and 280 kg N ha-1) of a single polyolefin-coated urea (PCU) application versus split applications of urea on ‘Russet Burbank’ potato yield and on NO3 leaching and N recovery efficiency (RE) on a loamy sand. Standard irrigation was applied in all years and excessive irrigation was used in another experiment in the third year. At the recommended rate of 280 kg N ha-1, NO3 leaching during the growing season was 34 to 49% lower with PCU than three applications of urea. Under standard irrigation in the third year, leaching from five applications of urea (280 kg N ha-1) was 38% higher than PCU. Under leaching conditions in the first year (>=25 mm drainage water in at least one 24-h period) and excessive irrigation in the third year, PCU at 280 kg N ha-1 improved total and marketable tuber yields by 12 to 19% compared with three applications of urea. Fertilizer N RE estimated by the difference and 15N isotope methods at the 280 kg N ha-1 rate was, on average, higher with PCU (mean 50%) than urea (mean 43%). Fertilizer N RE values estimated by the isotope method (mean 51%) were greater than those estimated by the difference method (mean 47%). Results from this study indicate that PCU can reduce leaching and improve N recovery and tuber yield during seasons with high leaching.

Abbreviations: CRF, controlled-release fertilizer • DAP, days after planting • PCU, polyolefin-coated urea • RE, recovery efficiency


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 377-382. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. G. Bundy and T. W. Andraski
Recovery of Fertilizer Nitrogen in Crop Residues and Cover Crops on an Irrigated Sandy Soil
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 11, 2005; 69(3): 640 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.