JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conant, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Paustian, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conant, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Paustian, K.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Conant, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Paustian, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Experiment Design
Right arrow Soil Analysis
Right arrow Spatial Distribution
Journal of Environmental Quality 32:278-286 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Plant and Environment Interactions

Spatial Variability of Soil Carbon in Forested and Cultivated Sites

Implications for Change Detection

Richard T. Conant*,a, Gordon R. Smithb and Keith Paustiana

a Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499
b Environmental Resources Trust, 209 NW 58th Street, Seattle, WA 98107-2030

* Corresponding author (conant{at}nrel.colostate.edu)

Received for publication February 23, 2002. The potential to sequester atmospheric carbon in agricultural and forest soils to offset greenhouse gas emissions has generated interest in measuring changes in soil carbon resulting from changes in land management. However, inherent spatial variability of soil carbon limits the precision of measurement of changes in soil carbon and hence, the ability to detect changes. We analyzed variability of soil carbon by intensively sampling sites under different land management as a step toward developing efficient soil sampling designs. Sites were tilled cropland and a mixed deciduous forest in Tennessee, and old-growth and second-growth coniferous forest in western Washington, USA. Six soil cores within each of three microplots were taken as an initial sample and an additional six cores were taken to simulate resampling. Soil C variability was greater in Washington than in Tennessee, and greater in less disturbed than in more disturbed sites. Using this protocol, our data suggest that differences on the order of 2.0 Mg C ha-1 could be detected by collection and analysis of cores from at least five (tilled) or two (forest) microplots in Tennessee. More spatial variability in the forested sites in Washington increased the minimum detectable difference, but these systems, consisting of low C content sandy soil with irregularly distributed pockets of organic C in buried logs, are likely to rank among the most spatially heterogeneous of systems. Our results clearly indicate that consistent intramicroplot differences at all sites will enable detection of much more modest changes if the same microplots are resampled.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
C. M. Flint, R. B. Harrison, B. D. Strahm, and A. B. Adams
Nitrogen Leaching from Douglas-fir Forests after Urea Fertilization
J. Environ. Qual., August 8, 2008; 37(5): 1781 - 1788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.