|
|
||||||||
,a
a Soil and Water Science Dep., Univ. of Florida, IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611
b Statistics Dep., Univ. of Florida, IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611
c Animal Sciences Dep., Univ. of Florida, IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611
d Central Mississippi Research and Extension Center, MSU, Raymond, MS 39154
* Corresponding author (krw{at}mail.ifas.ufl.edu)
Florida dairies need year-round forage systems that prevent loss of N to ground water from waste effluent sprayfields. Our purpose was to quantify forage N removal and monitor nitrate N (NO-3N) concentrations in soil water below the rooting zone for two forage systems during four 12-mo cycles (19962000). Soil in the sprayfield is an excessively drained Kershaw sand (thermic, uncoated Typic Quartzipsamment). Over four cycles, average loading rates of effluent N were 500, 690, and 910 kg ha-1 per cycle. Nitrogen removed by the bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.)rye (Secale cereale L.) system (BR) during the first three cycles was 465 kg ha-1 per cycle for the low loading rate, 528 kg ha-1 for the medium rate, and 585 kg ha-1 for the high. For the corn (Zea mays L.)forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]rye system (CSR), N removals were 320 kg ha-1 per cycle for the low rate, 327 kg ha-1 for the medium, and 378 kg ha-1 for the high. The higher N removals for BR were attributed to higher N concentration in bermudagrass (18.124.2 g kg-1) than in corn and forage sorghum (10.314.7 g kg-1). Dry matter yield declined in the fourth cycle for bermudagrass but N removal continued to be higher for BR than CSR. The BR system was much more effective at preventing NO-3N leaching. For CSR, NO-3N levels in soil water (1.5 m below surface) increased steeply during the period between the harvest of one forage and canopy closure of the next. Overall, the BR system was better than CSR at removing N from the soil and maintaining low NO-3N concentrations below the rooting zone.
Abbreviations: BR, bermudagrassrye system CSR, cornforage sorghumrye system DM, dry matter
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Grunwald, P. Goovaerts, C. M. Bliss, N. B. Comerford, and S. Lamsal Incorporation of Auxiliary Information in the Geostatistical Simulation of Soil Nitrate Nitrogen Vadose Zone J., March 8, 2006; 5(1): 391 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Crohn Optimizing Organic Fertilizer Applications under Steady-State Conditions. J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2006; 35(2): 658 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Woodard, E. C. French, L. A. Sweat, D. A. Graetz, L. E. Sollenberger, B. Macoon, K. M. Portier, S. J. Rymph, B. L. Wade, G. M. Prine, et al. Nitrogen Removal and Nitrate Leaching for Two Perennial, Sod-Based Forage Systems Receiving Dairy Effluent J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2003; 32(3): 996 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Soil Science Society of America Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | The Plant Genome | |||