|
|
||||||||
Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, 3111 Plant Sciences, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7272
* Corresponding author (pghartel{at}arches.uga.edu)
Received for publication September 4, 2001. Regulatory agencies are interested in a fecal indicator bacterium with a host range limited to humans because human fecal contamination represents the greatest hazard to humans, yet is a relatively easy nonpoint source to remedy. Watersheds with human fecal contamination could be given first priority for cleanup. A fecal indicator bacterium with a host range limited to humans and a few other warm-blooded animal species would also simplify microbial source tracking because only a few animal species would be required for any host origin database. The literature suggests that the fecal indicator bacterium Enterococcus faecalis has a limited host range. On this basis, we selected this bacterium for study. Of 583 fecal streptococcal isolates obtained on Enterococcosel agar from Canada goose, cattle, deer, dog, human, chicken, and swine, 392 were considered presumptive enterococci and were subsequently speciated with the API 20 Strep system. Of these isolates, 22 were Ent. durans (5.6%), 61 were Ent. faecalis (15.6%), 98 were Ent. faecium (25.0%), 86 were Ent. gallinarum (21.9%), and 125 were unidentified (31.9%). The host range of the Ent. faecalis isolates was limited to dogs, humans, and chickens. Media were developed to isolate and identify Ent. faecalis quickly from fecal samples and this scheme eliminated Ent. faecalis isolates from dogs. When the remaining Ent. faecalis isolates were ribotyped, it was possible to differentiate clearly among the isolates from human and chicken. It may be that combining the potentially limited host range of Ent. faecalis with ribotyping is useful for prioritizing watersheds with fecal contamination.
Abbreviations: ATCC, American Type Culture Collection BHI, Brain Heart Infusion
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Dickerson Jr., J. B. Crozier, C. Hagedorn, and A. Hassall Assessment of the 16S-23S rDNA Intergenic Spacer Region in Enterococcus spp. for Microbial Source Tracking J. Environ. Qual., October 16, 2007; 36(6): 1661 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Ruecker, S. L. Braithwaite, E. Topp, T. Edge, D. R. Lapen, G. Wilkes, W. Robertson, D. Medeiros, C. W. Sensen, and N. F. Neumann Tracking Host Sources of Cryptosporidium spp. in Raw Water for Improved Health Risk Assessment Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 15, 2007; 73(12): 3945 - 3957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. McDonald, P. G. Hartel, L. C. Gentit, C. N. Belcher, K. W. Gates, K. Rodgers, J. A. Fisher, K. A. Smith, and K. A. Payne Identifying sources of fecal contamination inexpensively with targeted sampling and bacterial source tracking. J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 889 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Soule, E. Kuhn, F. Loge, J. Gay, and D. R. Call Using DNA microarrays to identify library-independent markers for bacterial source tracking. Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 1, 2006; 72(3): 1843 - 1851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Middleton and A. Ambrose ENUMERATION AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE PATTERNS OF FECAL INDICATOR ORGANISMS ISOLATED FROM MIGRATORY CANADA GEESE (BRANTA CANADENSIS) J. Wildl. Dis., April 1, 2005; 41(2): 334 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Johnson, M. B. Brown, E. A. Carruthers, J. A. Ferguson, P. E. Dombek, and M. J. Sadowsky Sample Size, Library Composition, and Genotypic Diversity among Natural Populations of Escherichia coli from Different Animals Influence Accuracy of Determining Sources of Fecal Pollution Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2004; 70(8): 4478 - 4485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wildschutte, D. M. Wolfe, A. Tamewitz, and J. G. Lawrence Protozoan predation, diversifying selection, and the evolution of antigenic diversity in Salmonella PNAS, July 20, 2004; 101(29): 10644 - 10649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lu, U. Idris, B. Harmon, C. Hofacre, J. J. Maurer, and M. D. Lee Diversity and Succession of the Intestinal Bacterial Community of the Maturing Broiler Chicken Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2003; 69(11): 6816 - 6824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Kuntz, P. G. Hartel, D. G. Godfrey, J. L. McDonald, K. W. Gates, and W. I. Segars Targeted Sampling Protocol as Prelude to Bacterial Source Tracking with Enterococcus faecalis J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2003; 32(6): 2311 - 2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Wiggins, P. W. Cash, W. S. Creamer, S. E. Dart, P. P. Garcia, T. M. Gerecke, J. Han, B. L. Henry, K. B. Hoover, E. L. Johnson, et al. Use of Antibiotic Resistance Analysis for Representativeness Testing of Multiwatershed Libraries Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2003; 69(6): 3399 - 3405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Soil Science Society of America Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | The Plant Genome | |||