HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (25) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Addy, K. Articles by Sawyer, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Addy, K. Articles by Sawyer, C. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Addy, K. Articles by Sawyer, C. Related Collections Wetlands and Aquatic Processes Nitrogen Nutrient Cycling Wetland Soils Ground Water Quality

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Wetlands and Aquatic Processes

In Situ Push–Pull Method to Determine Ground Water Denitrification in Riparian Zones

^a Dep. of Natural Resources Science, Coastal Institute in Kingston, Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881
^b Dep. of Plant Sciences, Woodward Hall, Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881

* Corresponding author (agold{at}uri.edu)

Received for publication March 27, 2001. To quantify ground water denitrification in discrete locations of riparian aquifers, we modified and evaluated an in situ method based on conservative tracers and ¹⁵N-enriched nitrate. Ground water was "pushed" (i.e., injected) into a mini-piezometer and then "pulled" (i.e., extracted) from the same mini-piezometer after an incubation period. This push–pull method was applied in replicate mini-piezometers at two Rhode Island riparian sites, one fresh water and one brackish water. Conservative tracer pretests were conducted to determine incubation periods, ranging from 5 to 120 h, to optimize recovery of introduced plumes. For nitrate push–pull tests, we used two conservative tracers, sulfur hexafluoride and bromide, to provide insight into plume recovery. The two conservative tracers behaved similarly. The dosing solutions were amended with ¹⁵N-enriched nitrate that enabled us to quantify the mass of denitrification gases generated during the incubation period. The in situ push–pull method detected substantial denitrification rates at a site where we had previously observed high denitrification rates. At our brackish site, we found high rates of ground water denitrification in marsh locations and minimal denitrification in soils fringing the marsh. The push–pull method can provide useful insights into spatial and temporal patterns of denitrification in riparian zones. The method is robust and results are not seriously affected by dilution or degassing from ground water to soil air. In conjunction with measurements of ground water flowpaths, this method holds promise for evaluating the influence of site and management factors on the ground water nitrate removal capacity of riparian zones.

Abbreviations: C/C_o, concentration of pulled sample/concentration of pushed sample • DO, dissolved oxygen • DOC, dissolved organic carbon

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2002 31: 705-710. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Whitmire and S. K. Hamilton Rapid Removal of Nitrate and Sulfate in Freshwater Wetland Sediments J. Environ. Qual., October 12, 2005; 34(6): 2062 - 2071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Q. Kellogg, A. J. Gold, P. M. Groffman, K. Addy, M. H. Stolt, and G. Blazejewski In Situ Ground Water Denitrification in Stratified, Permeable Soils Underlying Riparian Wetlands J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2005; 34(2): 524 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Maitre, A.-C. Cosandey, A. Parriaux, and C. Guenat A Methodology to Estimate the Denitrifying Capacity of a Riparian Wetland J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2005; 34(2): 707 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]