HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lentz, R. D. Articles by Mackey, B. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lentz, R. D. Articles by Mackey, B. E. Agricola Articles by Lentz, R. D. Articles by Mackey, B. E. Related Collections Irrigation Surface Water Quality Water Quality Best Management Practices Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORT
Surface Water Quality

Fate and Efficacy of Polyacrylamide Applied in Furrow Irrigation

Full-Advance and Continuous Treatments

^a USDA-ARS, Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Lab., 3793 N 3600 E, Kimberly, ID 83341
^b USDA-ARS-PWA, 800 Buchanan St., Albany, CA 94710

* Corresponding author (lentz{at}nwisrl.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication March 23, 2001. Polyacrylamide (PAM) is applied to 400000 irrigated hectares annually in the USA to control irrigation-induced erosion, yet the fate of dissolved PAM applied in irrigation water is not well documented. We determined the fate of PAM added to furrow streams under two treatments: Initial-10, 10 mg L^-1 PAM product applied only during the initial hours of the irrigation, and Cont-1, 1.0 mg L^-1 PAM product applied continuously during the entire irrigation. The study measured PAM concentrations in 167-m-long PAM-treated furrow streams and along a 530-m tail ditch that received this runoff. Soil was Portneuf silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Durinodic Xeric Haplocalcid) with 1.5% slope. Samples were taken at three times during the irrigations, both during and after PAM application. Polyacrylamide was adsorbed to soil and removed from solution as the streams traversed the soil-lined channels. The removal rate increased with stream sediment concentration. Stream sediment concentrations were higher when PAM concentrations were <2 mg L^-1 a.i., for early irrigations, and when untreated tributary flows combined with the stream. In these cases, PAM concentration decreased to undetectable levels over the flow lengths used in this study. When inflows contained >6 mg L^-1 PAM a.i., stream sediment concentrations were minimal and PAM concentrations did not change down the furrow, though they decreased to undetectable levels within 0.5 h after application ceased. One percent of applied PAM was lost in tail-ditch runoff. This loss could have been eliminated by treating only the furrow advance or not treating the last two irrigations.

Abbreviations: Cont-1, 1 mg L^-1 polyacrylamide product (0.8 mg L^-1 a.i.) applied continuously to furrow inflows • Initial-10, 10 mg L^-1 polyacrylamide product (8 mg L^-1 a.i.) applied to initial irrigation inflows only • PAM, water-soluble anionic polyacrylamide

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. C. Goodson, G. Schwartz, and C. Amrhein Controlling Tailwater Sediment and Phosphorus Concentrations with Polyacrylamide in the Imperial Valley, California J. Environ. Qual., May 31, 2006; 35(4): 1072 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A. Ajwa and T. J. Trout Polyacrylamide and Water Quality Effects on Infiltration in Sandy Loam Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 643 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lu, L. Wu, and J. Gan Determination of Polyacrylamide in Soil Waters by Size Exclusion Chromatography J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2003; 32(5): 1922 - 1926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]