JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forster, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forster, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Forster, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Conservation
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Economics
Right arrow Water Pollution
Journal of Environmental Quality 31:32-37 (2002)
© 2002 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

SPECIAL SUBMISSIONS
Findings from the USDA-sponsored Lake Erie Agricultural Systems for Environmental Quality Project

Effects of Conservation Tillage on the Performance of Lake Erie Basin Farms

D. Lynn Forster*

Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, The Ohio State University, 2120 Fyffe Rd., Columbus, Ohio 43210

* Corresponding author (forster.4{at}osu.edu)

Received for publication August 12, 2000. This paper summarizes research that investigates the effects of alternative farming practices on the performance of Lake Erie basin farms. First, data from a representative panel of about 100 farmers is analyzed to determine how conservation tillage, rotations, and other factors affected farms' economic returns during 1987–1992. Statistical analysis of these data is unable to demonstrate that there is any significant relationship between farming system (i.e., tillage and rotation) variables and farm profitability. Next, a farm-level bioeconomic simulation model is used to analyze the effects of conservation tillage adoption on farm profitability, farm size, and pollutant emissions. Findings are that tillage system, farm size, and crop selection are determined jointly and may substantially improve economic performance of farms. Conservation tillage enables farms to be larger and more specialized, and as a result, farm profitability improves. Statistical analysis of farm panel data is unable to show the effect of tillage on profitability because it neglects to account for endogeneity of variables (or joint effects of tillage, size, crop selection, and performance) in production decisions.

Abbreviations: ROA, return on assets




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. P. Richards, F. G. Calhoun, and G. Matisoff
The Lake Erie Agricultural Systems for Environmental Quality Project: An Introduction
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2002; 31(1): 6 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
D. B. Moog and P. J. Whiting
Climatic and Agricultural Contributions to Changing Loads in Two Watersheds in Ohio
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2002; 31(1): 83 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.