|
|
||||||||
a Environmental and Resource Sciences, Fleischmann Agriculture Bldg/370, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557
b Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Lab., P.O. Box 2008, Building 1059, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6422
* Corresponding author (dwj{at}unr.edu)
Received for publication February 19, 2001. The effects of changing precipitation on soil leaching in a deciduous forest were examined by experimentally manipulating throughfall fluxes in the field. In addition to an ambient treatment (AMB), throughfall fluxes were reduced by 33% (DRY treatment) and increased by 33% (WET treatment) using a system of rain gutters and sprinklers on Walker Branch Watershed, Tennessee. Soil leaching was measured with resin lysimeters in the O horizons and with ceramic cup lysimeters in the E (25 cm) and Bt (70 cm) horizons. Large and statistically significant treatment effects on N fluxes were found in the O horizons (lower N fluxes in the DRY and higher N fluxes in the WET treatment). Together with the greater O horizon N content observed in the DRY treatment, this suggested that N was being immobilized at a greater rate in the DRY treatment than in the AMB or WET treatments. No statistically significant treatment effects on soil solution were found in the E horizons with the exception of (Ca2+ + Mg2+) to K+ ratio. Statistically significant treatment effects on electrical conductivity (EC), pH, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+, SO2-4, and Cl- were found in the Bt horizons due to differences between the DRY and other treatments. Despite this, calculated fluxes of Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+, SO2-4, and Cl- were lowest in the DRY treatment. These results suggest that lower precipitation will cause temporary N immobilization in litter and long-term enrichment in soil base cations whereas increased precipitation will cause long-term depletion of soil base cations.
Abbreviations: AMB, no treatment, ambient throughfall DO, dry, open (location in the DRY treatment between troughs) DRY, treatment where throughfall flux was decreased by 33% DT, dry, treated (location in the DRY treatment under troughs) EC, electrical conductivity NuCM, Nutrient Cycling Model ortho-P, ortho-phosphate SWF, soil water flux TDE, Throughfall Displacement Experiment WET, treatment where throughfall flux was increased by 33% WO, wet, open (location in the WET treatment removed from drip points) WT, wet, treated (location in the WET treatment near drip points)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Wilcke and J. Lilienfein Nutrient Leaching in Oxisols Under Native and Managed Vegetation in Brazil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 2, 2005; 69(4): 1152 - 1161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Langlois, D. W. Johnson, and G. R. Mehuys Adsorption and Recovery of Dissolved Organic Phosphorus and Nitrogen by Mixed-Bed Ion-Exchange Resin Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2003; 67(3): 889 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Soil Science Society of America Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | The Plant Genome | |||