JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Journal of Environmental Quality 31:150-154 (2002)
© 2002 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORT
Ecological Risk Assessment

Genotoxicity is Unrelated to Total Concentration of Priority Carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soils Undergoing Biological Treatment

Renee R. Alexander, Jixin Tang and Martin Alexander*

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences and Institute for Comparative and Environmental Toxicology, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853

* Corresponding author (ma59{at}cornell.edu)

Received for publication May 21, 2001. A solid-phase microbiological assay was used to determine the changes in genotoxicity associated with sequestration or biodegradation of carcinogenic compounds in contaminated soils. The concentration of six carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) did not change in 59 d in sterile soil, but the genotoxicity declined markedly. In a soil undergoing bioremediation in the field for 147 d or biodegradation in the laboratory for 180 d, the concentrations either changed little or declined at different rates, but the genotoxicity increased followed by a decline. The genotoxicity of a second soil declined as a result of biological treatment. The data show that genotoxicity of contaminated soils may be unrelated to the concentration of carcinogenic PAHs because of aging or new mutagens formed during biological treatment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
T. Spriggs, M. K. Banks, and P. Schwab
Phytoremediation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Manufactured Gas Plant-Impacted Soil
J. Environ. Qual., September 8, 2005; 34(5): 1755 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.