HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cessna, A. J. Articles by Nicholaichuk, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cessna, A. J. Articles by Nicholaichuk, W. Agricola Articles by Cessna, A. J. Articles by Nicholaichuk, W. Related Collections Surface Water Quality Water Quality Nutrient Management Agricultural Pesticides Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORT
Surface Water Quality

Herbicide and Nutrient Transport from an Irrigation District into the South Saskatchewan River

^a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
^b National Water Research Institute, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
^c Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration, Canada-Saskatchewan Irrigation Diversification Centre, Outlook, SK, Canada
^d National Water Research Institute, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

* Corresponding author (allan.cessna{at}ec.gc.ca)

Received for publication August 1, 2000. Pesticides and nutrients can be transported from treated agricultural land in irrigation runoff and thus can affect the quality of receiving waters. A 3-yr study was carried out to assess possible detrimental effects on the downstream water quality of the South Saskatchewan River due to herbicide and plant nutrient inputs via drainage water from an irrigation district. Automated water samplers and flow monitors were used to intensively sample the drainage water and to monitor daily flows in two major drainage ditches, which drained approximately 40% of the flood-irrigated land within the irrigation district. Over three years, there were no detectable inputs of ethalfluralin into the river and those of trifluralin were less than 0.002% of the amount applied to flood-irrigated fields. Inputs of MCPA, bromoxynil, dicamba and mecoprop were 0.06% or less of the amounts applied, whereas that for clopyralid was 0.31%. The relatively higher input (1.4%) of 2,4-D to the river was probably due its presence in the irrigation water. Corresponding inputs of P (as total P) and N (as nitrate plus ammonia) were 2.2 and 1.9% of applied fertilizer, respectively. Due to dilution of the drainage water in the river, maximum daily herbicide (with the exception of 2,4-D) and nutrient loadings to the river would not have resulted in significant concentration increases in the river water. There was no consistent remedial effect on herbicides entering the river due to passage of the drainage water through a natural wetland. In contrast, a considerable portion of the nutrients entering the river originated from the wetland.

Abbreviations: SSRID#1, South Saskatchewan River Irrigation District #1

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Tian, T. C. Granato, R. I. Pietz, C. R. Carlson, and Z. Abedin Effect of Long-Term Application of Biosolids for Land Reclamation on Surface Water Chemistry J. Environ. Qual., January 3, 2006; 35(1): 101 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]