HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Connor, G. A. Articles by Van Riper, G. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by O'Connor, G. A. Articles by Van Riper, G. G. Agricola Articles by O'Connor, G. A. Articles by Van Riper, G. G. Related Collections Municipal Waste Heavy Metals Soil Pollution

Article
REVIEWS AND ANALYSES

A Modified Risk Assessment to Establish Molybdenum Standards for Land Application of Biosolids

^a Soil and Water Science Dep., Univ. of Florida, P.O. Box 110510, Gainesville, FL 32611
^b Dep. of Animal Science, Univ. of Florida, P.O. Box 110510, Gainesville, FL 32611
^c USDA/ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705
^d Dep. of Animal Sci., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
^e Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
^f Montgomery Watson, Lakewood, CO 80228

* Corresponding author (gao{at}ufl.edu)

Received for publication June 15, 2000. The USEPA standards (40 CFR Part 503) for the use or disposal of sewage sludge (biosolids) derived risk-based numerical values for Mo for the biosolids land plant animal pathway (Pathway 6). Following legal challenge, most Mo numerical standards were withdrawn, pending additional field-generated data using modern biosolids (Mo concentrations <75 mg kg^-1) and a reassessment of this pathway. This paper presents a reevaluation of biosolids Mo data, refinement of the risk assessment algorithms, and a reassessment of Mo-induced hypocuprosis from land application of biosolids. Forage Mo uptake coefficients (UC) are derived from field studies, many of which used modern biosolids applied to numerous soil types, with varying soil pH values, and supporting various crops. Typical cattle diet scenarios are used to calculate a diet-weighted UC value that realistically represents forage Mo exposure to cattle. Recent biosolids use data are employed to estimate the fraction of animal forage (FC) likely to be affected by biosolids applications nationally. Field data are used to estimate long-term Mo leaching and a leaching correction factor (LC) is used to adjust cumulative biosolids application limits. The modified UC and new FC and LC factors are used in a new algorithm to calculate biosolids Mo Pathway 6 risk. The resulting numerical standards for Mo are cumulative limit (RPc) = 40 kg Mo ha^-1, and alternate pollutant limit (APL) = 40 mg Mo kg^-1. We regard the modifications to algorithms and parameters and calculations as conservative, and believe that the risk of Mo-induced hypocuprosis from biosolids Mo is small. Providing adequate Cu mineral supplements, standard procedure in proper herd management, would augment the conservatism of the new risk assessment.

Abbreviations: BC, background concentration of pollutant in forage • FC, fraction of animal forage likely to be affected by biosolids application • HEI, highly exposed individual • LC, leaching correction factor • RF, allowable Mo increment in plant tissue • RPc, cumulative biosolids application limit • TPI, threshold pollutant intake at which a toxic effect is noted in animals consuming the forage • UC, uptake coefficient

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Schroder, H. Zhang, D. Zhou, N. Basta, W. R. Raun, M. E. Payton, and A. Zazulak The Effect of Long-Term Annual Application of Biosolids on Soil Properties, Phosphorus, and Metals Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 73 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. O'Connor, H. A. Elliott, N. T. Basta, R. K. Bastian, G. M. Pierzynski, R. C. Sims, and J. E. Smith Jr. Sustainable Land Application: An Overview J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2005; 34(1): 7 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. T. Basta, J. A. Ryan, and R. L. Chaney Trace Element Chemistry in Residual-Treated Soil: Key Concepts and Metal Bioavailability J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2005; 34(1): 49 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Stehouwer and K. E. Macneal Effect of Alkaline-Stabilized Biosolids on Alfalfa Molybdenum and Copper Content J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 133 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Gaskin, R. B. Brobst, W. P. Miller, and E. W. Tollner Long-Term Biosolids Application Effects on Metal Concentrations in Soil and Bermudagrass Forage J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2003; 32(1): 146 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Goldberg, S. M. Lesch, and D. L. Suarez Predicting Molybdenum Adsorption by Soils Using Soil Chemical Parameters in the Constant Capacitance Model Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 1836 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. O'Connor, T. C. Granato, and N. T. Basta Bioavailability of Biosolids Molybdenum to Soybean Grain J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2001; 30(5): 1653 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]