HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dou, Z. Articles by Ferguson, J.D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dou, Z. Articles by Ferguson, J.D. Agricola Articles by Dou, Z. Articles by Ferguson, J.D. Related Collections Experiment Design Nutrient Management Statistics Animal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORT
Waste Management

Manure Sampling for Nutrient Analysis

Variability and Sampling Efficacy

Center for Animal Health and Productivity, School of Veterinary Medicine, Univ. of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Road, Kennett Square, PA 19348

* Corresponding author (dou{at}cahp2.nbc.upenn.edu)

Received for publication July 6, 2000. Reliable estimation of nutrient concentrations is required to manage animal manure for protecting waters while sustaining crop production. This study was conducted to investigate sample variability and reliable nutrient analysis for several manure types and handling systems. Serial samples were collected from dairy, swine, and broiler poultry operations while manure was being loaded onto hauler tanks or spreaders for field application. Samples were analyzed for total solids (TS), total nitrogen (N), ammoniacal nitrogen (NH₄–N), total phosphorus (P), and potassium (K). The least number of samples needed for reliable testing of total N and P, defined as ±10% of the experimental means with 99% probability, was obtained for each farm using a computer-intensive random resampling technique. Sample variability within farms, expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV), was mostly 6 to 8% for farms that used agitation of manure storages but several times higher (20–30%) on farms where no agitation was applied during the sampling period. Results from the random resampling procedure indicated that for farms that used agitation, three to five samples were adequate for a representative composite for reliable testing of total N and P; whereas for farms without agitation, at least 40 samples would be required. Data also suggest that using book values for manure nutrient estimations could be problematic because the discrepancies between book standards and measured farm data varied widely from a small amount to several fold.

Abbreviations: TS, total solids

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. E. Hill and B. J. Cade-Menun Phosphorus-31 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Transect Study of Poultry Operations on the Delmarva Peninsula J. Environ. Qual., January 13, 2009; 38(1): 130 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. R. Sanford, A. R. Cook, J. L. Posner, J. L. Hedtcke, J. A. Hall, and J. O. Baldock Linking Wisconsin Dairy and Grain Farms via Manure Transfer for Corn Production Agron. J., January 8, 2009; 101(1): 167 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]