HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Seoane, S. Articles by Leirós, M.C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Seoane, S. Articles by Leirós, M.C. Agricola Articles by Seoane, S. Articles by Leirós, M.C. Related Collections Other Environmental Contamination Other Pollution Soil Chemistry Industrial Waste

TECHNICAL REPORT
Waste Management

Acidification–Neutralization Processes in a Lignite Mine Spoil Amended with Fly Ash or Limestone

^a Escuela Politécnica Superior, Departamento de Edafología y Química Agrícola, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Universitario, 27002 Lugo, Spain
^b Facultad de Farmacia, Departamento de Edafología y Química Agrícola, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

* Corresponding author (seoane{at}lugo.usc.es)

Received for publication May 22, 2000. A laboratory experiment was conducted to investigate the long-term effects of amending sulfide-rich lignite mine spoil with fly ash (originating from a coal-fired power station and largely comprised of aluminosilicates) and/or agricultural limestone. The experiment was carried out with soil moisture maintained at field capacity or alternate cycles of wetting and drying. Results obtained suggest that the principal acidification processes were oxidation of sulfide and formation of hydroxysulfate (FeOHSO₄), whereas the main neutralization processes were weathering of aluminosilicates in fly ash–treated samples and dissolution of calcium carbonate in limestone-treated samples. The highest dose of limestone rapidly raised the pH of the spoil, but this increase was not maintained throughout the one-year experiment. In contrast, fly ash–treated samples showed a more sustained increase in pH, attributable to the gradual weathering of aluminosilicates. The best results (i.e., good short- and long-term neutralization) were obtained in samples treated with both fly ash and limestone. The low liming capacity of the fly ash (47.85 cmol kg^-1) means that it must be used in large quantities, an advantage in achieving the further aim of disposing of the fly ash.

Abbreviations: FC, field capacity • SI, saturation index • WD, wetting–drying cycles

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. W. Titshall, J. C. Hughes, C. D. Morris, and P. J. K. Zacharias The Disposal of a Lime Water Treatment Residue on Soil and Spoil Material from a Coalmine: A Glasshouse Investigation J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2007; 36(2): 568 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]