JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (36)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, R.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Water Pollution
Journal of Environmental Quality 30:750-759 (2001)
© 2001 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

SPECIAL SUBMISSIONS
Minimizing the Impact of Pesticides on the Riverine Environment in Australia

Fate and Toxicity of Endosulfan in Namoi River Water and Bottom Sediment

Alex W. Leonarda, Ross V. Hyneb, Richard P. Lima, Kellie A. Leigha, Jiawei Lea,b,c and Ronald Beckettc

a Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Technology-Sydney, located at the Centre for Ecotoxicology, Westbourne Street, Gore Hill, NSW 2065 Australia
b Centre for Ecotoxicology, Westbourne Street, Gore Hill, NSW 2065 Australia
c CRC for Freshwater Ecology and Dep. of Chemistry Water Studies Centre, Monash Univ., Clayton, VIC, Australia

Corresponding author (hyner{at}epa.nsw.gov.au)

Received for publication October 8, 1999. Endosulfan (6,7,8,9,10,10,-hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-6,9-methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepine-3-oxide) sorption (standardized to 1% total organic carbon and dry weight) was significantly (P < 0.05) more concentrated on the large (>63 µm) particle fraction compared with smaller size fractions (<5 µm and 5–24 µm) of bottom sediments from the Namoi River, Australia. Following completion of the particle size fractionation (6 to 12 wk) and a sediment toxicity assessment (2 wk), the sediments showed large decreases in concentrations of {alpha}-endosulfan that coincided with an increase in endosulfan sulfate concentrations and minimal changes in ß-endosulfan concentrations. In the Namoi River, similar patterns were observed in the composition of total endosulfan in monthly measurements of bottom sediments and in passive samplers placed in the water column following runoff from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fields. The toxicity of endosulfan sulfate in river water indicated by the nymphs of the epibenthic mayfly Jappa kutera, was more persistent than the {alpha}- and ß-endosulfan parent isomers due to its longer half-life. This suggests that endosulfan sulfate would contribute most to previously observed changes in population densities of aquatic biota. Measured concentrations of total endosulfan in river water of up to 4 µg L-1 following storm runoff, exceed the range of the 96-h median lethal concentration (LC50) values in river water for both {alpha}-endosulfan (LC50 = 0.7 µg L-1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.5 to 1.1) and endosulfan sulfate (LC50 = 1.2 µg L-1; 95% CI = 0.4 to 3.3). In contrast, the 10-d LC50 value for total endosulfan in the sediment toxicity test (LC50 = 162 µg kg-1; 95% CI = 120 to 218 µg kg-1) was more than threefold higher than the highest measured concentration of total endosulfan in field samples of bottom sediment (48 µg kg-1). This suggests that pulse exposures of endosulfan in the water column following storm runoff may be more acutely toxic to riverine biota than in contaminated bottom sediment.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval • LC50, median lethal concentration • LOEC, lowest observable effect concentration • NOEC, no observable effect concentration • TOC, total organic carbon




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. T. Wan, J.-n. Kuo, and J. Pasternak
Residues of Endosulfan and Other Selected Organochlorine Pesticides in Farm Areas of the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia, Canada
J. Environ. Qual., June 7, 2005; 34(4): 1186 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. Schulz
Field Studies on Exposure, Effects, and Risk Mitigation of Aquatic Nonpoint-Source Insecticide Pollution: A Review
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 419 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
Q. Wu, G. Riise, and R. Kretzschmar
Size Distribution of Organic Matter and Associated Propiconazole in Agricultural Runoff Material
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2003; 32(6): 2200 - 2206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
V. Laabs, W. Amelung, A. A. Pinto, M. Wantzen, C. J. da Silva, and W. Zech
Pesticides in Surface Water, Sediment, and Rainfall of the Northeastern Pantanal Basin, Brazil
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2002; 31(5): 1636 - 1648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.