JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, S.O.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, S.O.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, S.O.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Water Pollution
Journal of Environmental Quality 30:1051-1058 (2001)
© 2001 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORT
Waste Management

Denitrification Losses from Outdoor Piglet Production

Spatial and Temporal Variability

S.O. Petersena, K. Kristensenb and J. Eriksena

a Dep. of Crop Physiology and Soil Science, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
b Dep. of Biometry, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark

Corresponding author (Soren.O.Petersen{at}agrsci.dk)

Received for publication March 13, 2000. Animal welfare considerations have stimulated the development of outdoor piglet (Sus scrofa) production systems, but the high levels of nutrients excreted suggest that nutrient losses from this system may be high. This study first described the spatial distribution of denitrification activity in a 5- x 5-m grid within and outside a paddock immediately after the sows (32 sows ha-1 for 6 mo) were removed in October 1997, and again the following March. Denitrification rates averaged 0.01 kg N ha-1 d-1 outside, and 0.5 kg N ha-1 d-1 inside the paddock in October, while the corresponding figures in March were 0.01 and 0.1 kg N ha-1 d-1. The highest denitrification rates were observed around the feeder, and this was also the case for concentrations of dissolved organic C and inorganic N in the soil. A statistical model that included both soil parameters and distance to feeder and huts gave the best description of the variability, but there was no significant autocorrelation between sampling points. In a second phase, seasonal variation of denitrification activity within a paddock (12 sows ha-1 yr-1) was quantified; 10 soil cores were sampled along a transect 11 times between March 1998 and February 1999. There was a significant positive effect of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) on denitrification at <25% gravimetric soil moisture (i.e., to November in this study). Both climate and management (position of huts and feeder) appeared to influence denitrification, which was estimated to be 69 kg N ha-1 yr-1, or 11% of the N surplus of this production system.

Abbreviations: DOC, dissolved organic carbon




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. M. Siegford, W. Powers, and H. G. Grimes-Casey
Environmental Aspects of Ethical Animal Production
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2008; 87(2): 380 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.