HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Porro, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Porro, I. Agricola Articles by Porro, I. Related Collections Municipal Waste Water Quality

TECHNICAL REPORT
WASTE MANAGEMENT

Hydrologic Behavior of Two Engineered Barriers following Extreme Wetting

Applied Geosciences Dep., Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Lab., P.O. Box 1625, 2525 North Fremont Avenue, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2107

Corresponding author (ixp{at}inel.gov)

Received for publication May 9, 2000. Many engineered barriers are expected to function for hundreds of years or longer. Over the course of time, it is likely that some barriers will experience infiltration to the point of breakthrough. This study compares the recovery from breakthrough of two storage–evapotranspiration type engineered barriers. Replicates of test plots comprising thick soil and capillary–biobarrier covers were wetted to breakthrough in 1997. Test plots were kept cleared of vegetation to maximize hydrologic stress during recovery. Following cessation of drainage resulting from the wetting irrigations, water storage levels in all plots were at elevated levels compared with pre-irrigation levels. As a result, infiltration of melting snow during the subsequent spring overloaded the storage capacity and produced drainage in all plots. Relatively rapid melting of accumulated snowfall produced the most significant infiltration events each year during the study. Capillary barriers yielded less total drainage than thick soil barriers. By limiting drainage, capillary barriers increased water storage in the upper portions of the test plots, which led to increased evaporation from the capillary barrier plots compared with thick soil plots. Increased evaporation in the capillary barrier plots allowed more water to infiltrate in the second season following the wetting tests without triggering drainage. All thick soil plots again yielded drainage in the second season. Within two years of intentionally induced breakthrough, evaporation alone (without transpiration) restored the capability of the capillary barrier covers to function as intended, although water storage in these covers remained at elevated levels.

Abbreviations: CFA, Central Facilities Area • FY, fiscal year • TDR, time-domain reflectometry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Nyhan A Seven-Year Water Balance Study of an Evapotranspiration Landfill Cover Varying in Slope for Semiarid Regions Vadose Zone J., June 9, 2005; 4(3): 466 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Lehman, K. E. Baker, and E. D. Mattson Distribution of Microorganisms and their Activities in Capillary Barriers: Implications for Modeling of Hydrologic Transport through Capillary Barriers Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2004; 3(1): 134 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]