HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (70) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boesch, D. F. Articles by Magnien, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boesch, D. F. Articles by Magnien, R. E. Agricola Articles by Boesch, D. F. Articles by Magnien, R. E. Related Collections Water Quality Ecosystem Restoration Nutrient Management

ARTICLE
SYMPOSIUM PAPER

Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication

Scientific Understanding, Ecosystem Restoration, and Challenges for Agriculture

^a University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, P.O. Box 775, Cambridge, MD 21613
^b College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Maryland, Queenstown, MD 21658
^c Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 580 Taylor Avenue, Annapolis, MD 21401

Corresponding author (boesch{at}ca.umces.edu)

Received for publication July 14, 2000. Chesapeake Bay has been the subject of intensive research on cultural eutrophication and extensive efforts to reduce nutrient inputs. In 1987 a commitment was made to reduce controllable sources of nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) by 40% by the year 2000, although the causes and effects of eutrophication were incompletely known. Subsequent research, modeling, and monitoring have shown that: (i) the estuarine ecosystem had been substantially altered by increased loadings of N and P of approximately 7- and 18-fold, respectively; (ii) hypoxia substantially increased since the 1950s; (iii) eutrophication was the major cause of reductions in submerged vegetation; and (iv) reducing nutrient sources by 40% would improve water quality, but less than originally thought. Strong public support and political commitment have allowed the Chesapeake Bay Program to reduce nutrient inputs, particularly from point sources, by 58% for P and 28% for N. However, reductions of nonpoint sources of P and N were projected by models to reach only 19% and 15%, respectively, of controllable loadings. The lack of reductions in nutrient concentrations in some streams and tidal waters and field research suggest that soil conservation–based management strategies are less effective than assumed. In 1997, isolated outbreaks of the toxic dinoflagellate Pfiesteria piscicida brought attention to the land application of poultry manure as a contributing factor to elevated soil P and ground water N concentrations. In addition to developing more effective agricultural practices, emerging issues include linking eutrophication and living resources, reducing atmospheric sources of N, enhancing nutrient sinks, controlling sprawling suburban development, and predicting and preventing harmful algal blooms.

Abbreviations: BMP, Best Management Practice • NMP, Nutrient Management Plan • SWCP, Soil and Water Conservation Plan • WWTP, wastewater treatment plants

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. B. Boomer, D. E. Weller, and T. E. Jordan Empirical Models Based on the Universal Soil Loss Equation Fail to Predict Sediment Discharges from Chesapeake Bay Catchments J. Environ. Qual., January 4, 2008; 37(1): 79 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Vaughan, B. A. Needelman, P. J.A. Kleinman, and A. L. Allen Vertical Distribution of Phosphorus in Agricultural Drainage Ditch Soils J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1895 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Vaughan, B. A. Needelman, P. J. A. Kleinman, and A. L. Allen Spatial Variation of Soil Phosphorus within a Drainage Ditch Network J. Environ. Qual., May 25, 2007; 36(4): 1096 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. W. Feyereisen, B. N. Wilson, G. R. Sands, J. S. Strock, and P. M. Porter Potential for a Rye Cover Crop to Reduce Nitrate Loss in Southwestern Minnesota Agron. J., October 3, 2006; 98(6): 1416 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Leytem, D. R. Smith, T. J. Applegate, and P. A. Thacker The Influence of Manure Phytic Acid on Phosphorus Solubility in Calcareous Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 3, 2006; 70(5): 1629 - 1638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Ginting and M. Mamo Measuring Runoff-Suspended Solids Using an Improved Turbidometer Method J. Environ. Qual., April 3, 2006; 35(3): 815 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. G. Rose, K. T. Paynter, and M. P. Hare Isolation by Distance in the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica, in Chesapeake Bay J. Hered., March 1, 2006; 97(2): 158 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Novak and D. W. Watts An Alum-Based Water Treatment Residual Can Reduce Extractable Phosphorus Concentrations in Three Phosphorus-Enriched Coastal Plain Soils J. Environ. Qual., September 8, 2005; 34(5): 1820 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. B. Ferguson, J. A. Nienaber, R. A. Eigenberg, and B. L. Woodbury Long-Term Effects of Sustained Beef Feedlot Manure Application on Soil Nutrients, Corn Silage Yield, and Nutrient Uptake J. Environ. Qual., August 9, 2005; 34(5): 1672 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. L. Bishop, W. D. Hively, J. R. Stedinger, M. R. Rafferty, J. L. Lojpersberger, and J. A. Bloomfield Multivariate Analysis of Paired Watershed Data to Evaluate Agricultural Best Management Practice Effects on Stream Water Phosphorus J. Environ. Qual., May 11, 2005; 34(3): 1087 - 1101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Tal, J. E. M. Watts, and H. J. Schreier Anaerobic Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria and Related Activity in Baltimore Inner Harbor Sediment Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 1, 2005; 71(4): 1816 - 1821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Butler and F. J. Coale Phosphorus Leaching in Manure-Amended Atlantic Coastal Plain Soils J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2005; 34(1): 370 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Slaton, K. R. Brye, M. B. Daniels, T. C. Daniel, R. J. Norman, and D. M. Miller Nutrient Input and Removal Trends for Agricultural Soils in Nine Geographic Regions in Arkansas J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 1606 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. V. Royer, J. L. Tank, and M. B. David Transport and Fate of Nitrate in Headwater Agricultural Streams in Illinois J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2004; 33(4): 1296 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Groffman and M. K. Crawford Denitrification Potential in Urban Riparian Zones J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2003; 32(3): 1144 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Sims, R. O. Maguire, A. B. Leytem, K. L. Gartley, and M. C. Pautler Evaluation of Mehlich 3 as an Agri-Environmental Soil Phosphorus Test for the Mid-Atlantic United States of America Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 2016 - 2032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. O. Maguire and J. T. Sims Measuring Agronomic and Environmental Soil Phosphorus Saturation and Predicting Phosphorus Leaching with Mehlich 3 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 2033 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. O. Maguire and J. T. Sims Soil Testing to Predict Phosphorus Leaching J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2002; 31(5): 1601 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]