JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 3:417-423 (1974)
© 1974 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feigin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Commoner, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Feigin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Commoner, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Feigin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Commoner, B.

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of 15N-Enriched vs. Unenriched Fertilizer Nitrogen as a Tracer in Laboratory Experiments1

Amos Feigin, William M. Vaughan, Ray Smith, Daniel H. Kohl, Georgia Shearer and Barry Commoner2

ABSTRACT

The experiments reported in this paper were designed (i) to determine whether it is possible to detect the presence of fertilizer nitrogen in nitrate produced by four central Illinois soils during laboratory incubation by using variations in the natural abundance of 15N, (ii) to use such variations to estimate the fractional contribution of fertilizer nitrogen to the nitrate produced, and (iii) to compare these estimates with those based on the use of fertilizer nitrogen which was artificially enriched with 15N. The mean {delta} 15N per mill excess) value of nitrate produced during incubation of the soils which had received unlabeled (NH4)2SO4 was significantly lower in 11 out of 12 experiments compared with that produced by unfertilized soils. As expected, estimates of percent fertilizer derived nitrogen based on variations in natural abundance of 15N were less precise than those based on the use of (NH4)2SO4 artificially enriched with 15N. The use of natural variations in 15N abundance to compute the percent fertilizer derived nitrate resulted in a lower estimate than the estimate based on 15N enriched material in seven experiments. This underestimation appeared to be related to the so called "priming effect" and/or the exchange of fertilizer and soil nitrogen.

Key Words: N isotope abundance • {delta} 15N • nitrate • fertilizer derived nitrogen • soil derived nitrogen


NOTES

1 The work is supported by the National Science Foundation under the Project Numbers GI-29925 X1 and GI-39009.

2 Research Associate, Center for the Biology of Natural Systems and Soil Scientist, Institute of Soils and Water, Agr. Res. Org., Volcani Center, Bet-Dagan, Israel; Associate, Center for the Biology of Natural Systems; Research Assistant, Center for the Biology of Natural Systems; Associate Professor of Biology, Washington University and Senior Fellow, Center for the Biology of Natural Systems; Research Associate, Center for the Biology of Natural Systems; Director, Center for the Biology of Natural Systems, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo., respectively.

Received for publication February 19, 1974.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1974 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.