JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 3:361-366 (1974)
© 1974 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Webber, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by King, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Webber, L. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by King, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Webber, L. R.

Application of Municipal Refuse and Liquid Sewage Sludge to Agricultural Land: I. Field Study1

Larry D. King, L. A. Rudgers and L. R. Webber2

ABSTRACT

The feasibility of using land for both waste disposal and crop production was studied by applying pulverized municipal refuse and liquid sewage sludge or liquid manure to land which was later planted to rye (Secale cereale L.) and subsequently to corn (Zea Mays L.). Refuse was applied at 188 metric tons/ha singly (R) or in combination with either 2.3 cm of liquid sewage sludge (RS) or 1.4 cm of liquid poultry manure (RM). Other treatments were a double waste rate—376 tons/ha of refuse + 4.6 cm of sludge (2[RS]), sludge alone (S), and a control (C) receiving no additions.

Yield of rye forage was not affected by treatment. Highest corn grain yields were obtained with the R treatment while yields with the S and 2(RS) treatments were significantly lower than yields with R. No treatments resulted in corn yields significantly different from the control treatment. Levels of Zn, Cu, Cd, and Pb in the rye and corn tissue were usually increased by waste additions but were below levels toxic to the crops or to animals that might consume the crops. Soil nitrate was increased by the various waste treatments. A considerable fraction of the nitrate lost from the soil profile during the winter could not be attributed to crop uptake.

Key Words: manure • heavy metals


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Department of Land Resource Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, NIG 2W1.

2 Formerly Post Doctoral Fellows, University of Guelph, presently Research Associate, Dept. of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27607; Assistant Professor, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg; and Professor, University of Guelph, respectively.

Received for publication December 11, 1973.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1974 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.