JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 29:2013-2020 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braskerud, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Krogstad, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Braskerud, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Krogstad, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Braskerud, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Krogstad, T.

The Impact of Hydraulic Load and Aggregation on Sedimentation of Soil Particles in Small Constructed Wetlands

B. C. Braskerud*

JORDFORSK (Norwegian Center for Soil and Environmental Research), N-1432 Aas, Norway;

H. Lundekvam and T. Krogstad

Dep. Soil and Water Sci., Agric. Univ. Norway, N-1432 Aas, Norway.

* Corresponding author (bent.braskerud{at}jordforsk.no).

ABSTRACT

Loss of soil particles from arable land to streams and lakes negatively affects water quality. When initiatives to mitigate soil erosion are insufficient or fail, constructed wetlands (CWs) could be a last buffer to mitigate pollution. The objectives in this study were to (i) determine the influence of aggregation on clay sedimentation in CWs and (ii) evaluate the prediction performance of two commonly used retention models, based on hydraulic load and particle sedimentation velocity. Retention was measured three ways, with (i) water flow proportional sampling systems in the inlet and in the outlet, (ii) sedimentation traps, and (iii) sedimentation plates. Surface area of the CWs was 0.03 to 0.07% of the watershed, which consisted of silty clay loam (18–33% clay). Some runoff episodes, usually at high runoff rates, accounted for a relatively high proportion of total sedimentation. Thus 80% of the particles were retained from less than 44% of the total runoff. Constructed wetland performance increased with increased hydraulic load or decreased detention time. The clay content in the CW sediment reflected the clay content in the arable soil. Actual CW sediment exceeded model estimates 2.5 to 8.2 times, depending on CW size and runoff. The probable reason for the prediction error is clay particles entering the CWs as aggregates. Constructed wetlands should be located in small streams to avoid break up of aggregates and a reduction in retention efficiency.


Received for publication August 18, 1999.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
S. K. Harter and W. J. Mitsch
Patterns of Short-Term Sedimentation in a Freshwater Created Marsh
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2003; 32(1): 325 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
B.C. Braskerud
The Influence of Vegetation on Sedimentation and Resuspension of Soil Particles in Small Constructed Wetlands
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2001; 30(4): 1447 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.