JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 29:1548-1554 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haith, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Andre, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haith, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Andre, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Haith, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Andre, B.

Curve Number Approach for Estimating Runoff from Turf

Douglas A. Haith*

Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Riley-Robb Hall, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853.

Benjamin Andre

Dep. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0428.

* Corresponding author (dah13{at}cornell.edu).

ABSTRACT

The curve number equation is one of the simplest and most commonly used models for estimating surface runoff. However, its applicability to turfgrasses has not been previously demonstrated. This study evaluated the approach by comparing model estimates with measured runoff data from turf field plots in six different states, including three different soil hydrologic groups, four turfgrasses, and a range of antecedent moisture and turf conditions. A set of curve numbers were developed for short and long grasses with and without thatch, and curve number selection was based on linear functions of 5-d antecedent precipitation. With the standard growing season antecedent moisture limits of 36 mm and 53 nun, the curve number model explained 78% of the observed variation in runoff and underpredicted the mean event runoff by 15%. With a downward adjustment of these limits to 22 nun and 53 mm in split-sample calibration, the underprediction of means was reduced to less than 3%. More significantly, the model mean for the largest observed events was within 6% of the observed mean. Provided model results are interpreted in a statistical sense rather than as individual events, the curve number model, as modified in this study, is a relatively accurate means of estimating turf runoff.


Received for publication November 12, 1999.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
P. Romero, G. Castro, J.A. Gomez, and E. Fereres
Curve Number Values for Olive Orchards under Different Soil Management
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 28, 2007; 71(6): 1758 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
D. A. Haith
TurfPQ, A Pesticide Runoff Model for Turf
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2001; 30(3): 1033 - 1039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.