JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 29:1172-1179 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hession, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Storm, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hession, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Storm, D. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hession, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Storm, D. E.

Watershed-Level Uncertainties: Implications for Phosphorus Management and Eutrophication

W. C. Hession*

Civil and Environmental Engineering Dep., Univ. of Vermont, 213 Votey Building, Burlington, VT 05405.

D. E. Storm

Biosystems Engineering Dep., 110 Agricultural Hall, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078.

* Corresponding author (hession{at}emba.uvm.edu).

ABSTRACT

Eutrophication is often the critical problem associated with surface waters having impaired water quality. Managing eutrophication in lakes and reservoirs typically involves the control of phosphorus inputs since it is often the limiting nutrient and because nitrogen and carbon are difficult to control. Management activities to address water quality impairment require a watershed-level approach. However, uncertainty and stochasticity are ubiquitous in watershed-level assessment and management. We describe and demonstrate a method for incorporating uncertainty analyses in watershed-level modeling using Wister Lake in Oklahoma as an example. Natural stochasticity, parameter error, and error due to aggregation of data are quantified separately to allow for a comparison of the various sources of uncertainty in modeling activities. Parameter error was found to be the greatest contributor to overall output uncertainty. Several example management scenarios are presented to illustrate the utility and flexibility of including uncertainty quantification in watershed-level management and decision making.


Received for publication April 20, 1999.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
Z. Miao, M. Trevisan, E. Capri, L. Padovani, and A. A. M. Del Re
Uncertainty Assessment of the Model RICEWQ in Northern Italy
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 2217 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. B. Daniels, P. Delaune, P. A. Moore Jr., A. Mauromoustakos, S. L. Chapman, and J. M. Langston
Soil Phosphorus Variability in Pastures: Implications for Sampling and Environmental Management Strategies
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2001; 30(6): 2157 - 2165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.