HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhao, S. L. Articles by Moncrief, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Zhao, S. L. Articles by Moncrief, J. F. Agricola Articles by Zhao, S. L. Articles by Moncrief, J. F.

Predicting Subsurface Drainage, Corn Yield, and Nitrate Nitrogen Losses with DRAINMOD-N

Resource 21, Denver, CO.
Dep. of Soil, Water, and Climate, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.
USDA-ARS, Pullman, WA.

^* Corresponding author (sgupta{at}soils.umn.edu).

ABSTRACT

Nitrate N from artificially drained soils of the upper Midwest USA is finding its way to the Mississippi River and then to the Gulf of Mexico. There is some concern that this nitrate N is causing hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. The DRAINMOD-N model was used to evaluate the long-term effect of N application rate and drain spacing on corn (Zea mays L.) yield and nitrate N losses. Prior to evaluation, the model was calibrated and then validated against long-term field data from southwestern Minnesota. A 24-yr simulation showed that climate plays a major role in determining drainage, yield, and nitrate N losses from a moderately well-drained Normania clay loam (fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Aquic Hapludoll) soil under continuous corn. April to August rainfall accounted for 82% of the variation in drainage and 66% of the variation in nitrate N losses during the growing season. Corn yield increased significantly when drain spacing was changed from 56 to 28 m but there was much less increase when changing from 28 to 14 m. During the growing season, drain spacing had little effect on nitrate N losses from this soil. Cost-benefit analysis showed that a 28 m drain spacing was a good design criterion for this soil. For a given drain spacing, an increase in N application rate significantly increased nitrate N losses through drainage. We conclude that efforts to reduce drainage-associated nitrate N losses from soils with perched water table conditions in the upper Midwest USA should concentrate on identifying N management strategies that increase N use efficiency.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Nangia, P. H. Gowda, D. J. Mulla, and G. R. Sands Water Quality Modeling of Fertilizer Management Impacts on Nitrate Losses in Tile Drains at the Field Scale J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 296 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Kucharik and K. R. Brye Integrated BIosphere Simulator (IBIS) Yield and Nitrate Loss Predictions for Wisconsin Maize Receiving Varied Amounts of Nitrogen Fertilizer J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2003; 32(1): 247 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. He, M. J. Vepraskas, R. W. Skaggs, and D. L. Lindbo Adapting a Drainage Model to Simulate Water Table Levels in Coastal Plain Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2002; 66(5): 1722 - 1731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Huggins, G. W. Randall, and M. P. Russelle Subsurface Drain Losses of Water and Nitrate following Conversion of Perennials to Row Crops Agron. J., May 1, 2001; 93(3): 477 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]