JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 29:380-387 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Okiro, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Okiro, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Okiro, M.

Nitrogen Mineralization of Lime-Stabilized Fishwaste in Acid Soils and its Effect on Plant Growth

S. Kuo*, P. R. Bristow, E. J. Jellum and M. Okiro

Washington State University, Puyallup Research and Extension Center, 7612 Pioneer Way East, Puyallup, WA 98371-4998.

* Corresponding author (skuo{at}wsu.edu).

ABSTRACT

Fishwaste is often disposed of in landfills or the ocean, adversely affecting water quality. With its high protein content, fishwaste could instead be used as a N source for crop production. The viability of a lime-stabilized fishwaste (LSF) product as a N source was tested by determining its effects on net N mineralization, growth of bacteria, and the growth of a variety of plant species in two acidic soils. Net N mineralization and viable bacteria number were significantly increased (P < 0.001) by the addition of LSF. At the highest rate of 30 g LSF kg–1 soil, high NH4-N accumulation was extended to several weeks and a longer lag period before bacteria growth occurred. At such a high rate, nitrification, but not the activities of proteolytic enzymes, was severely impaired. The considerably high inactivation rate for the bacteria following the exhaustion of the available energy in the protein in the Sultan soil [half life = 4.5 ± 0.5 d (SD)] may explain why the Sultan soil had a comparatively higher net N mineralization rate than the Puyallup soil [half life = 14.7 ± 3.5 d (SD)]. At 6 g LSF kg–1 soil in a greenhouse trial, the N availability to a variety of crops was generally increased. Unless a soil is extremely acidic, using high rates of LSF can lead to undesirable soil conditions (high pH and NH4-N accumulation) that interfere with plant growth.


NOTES

Scientific Paper No. 990326, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, College of Agriculture and Home Economics, Washington State University, Pullman.

Received for publication March 22, 1999.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.