HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Clausnitzer, H. Articles by Singer, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Clausnitzer, H. Articles by Singer, M. J. Agricola Articles by Clausnitzer, H. Articles by Singer, M. J.

Mineralogy of Agricultural Source Soil and Respirable Dust in California

Dep. of Land, Air and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.

^* Corresponding author (mjsinger{at}ucdavis.edu).

ABSTRACT

Inhalation of respirable dust (RD), defined as particles 4 µm in aerodynamic diameter, is a health concern. Soil disturbance by farming produces a range of airborne soil minerals of various sizes, but little is known about RD mineralogy compared with source soil or about mineralogy of RD as a function of particle size. General assumptions are that dust mineralogy reflects the source soil and that there is no sorting of RD mineralogy by particle size. We tested these assumptions by determining the size and mineralogy of RD particles from specific farming activities and comparing them to the source soil mineralogy. Samples were taken from plots growing furrow-irrigated crops near Davis, CA. Source-soil was analyzed by x-ray diffraction (XRD). Respirable dust was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with selected area electron diffraction. Mineralogy and size data of mineral groups from the two techniques were different. The TEM method was more reliable because it included crystallographic data as well as elemental composition and particle morphology. The same major mineral groups (quartz, mica, feldspar, and clays) were found in the RD and the source soil, but minor constituents of the RD such as serpentine minerals and zeolites were not detected in the source soil because they were not sufficiently abundant to be detected by standard XRD techniques. No significant sorting of source soil mineralogy occurred over the short distance between soil and RD sampler.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. B. Baker, R. J. Southard, and J. P. Mitchell Agricultural Dust Production in Standard and Conservation Tillage Systems in the San Joaquin Valley J. Environ. Qual., July 5, 2005; 34(4): 1260 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]