JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 28:721-726 (1999)
© 1999 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lembrich, D.
Right arrow Articles by Scheunert, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lembrich, D.
Right arrow Articles by Scheunert, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lembrich, D.
Right arrow Articles by Scheunert, I.

Microcosm Studies on the Volatility of Pesticides from Soil Surfaces

D. Lembrich, F. Beese and I. Scheunert*

GSF-Institute of Soil Ecology, Neuherberg, D-85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany,
Institut für Bodenkunde und Waldernährung, Georg-August Universität, Büsgenweg 2, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany.

* Corresponding author (scheunert{at}gsf.de).

ABSTRACT

A laboratory model was developed to investigate pesticide volatilization from soil surfaces under various boundary conditions. Carbon-14-1abeled terbutylazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-t-butylamino-1,3,5-triazine) was applied to the surface of different soils in doses commonly used in agriculture. The experimental setup was designed to study the dynamics of the volatilization process. Short sampling intervals give information about temporal changes in loss rates, which allows to quantify the influence of the application mode. Drop application, for example, leads to volatilization kinetics different from those by spraying, especially in the initial phase. Another aim of the experiments is to describe soil matrix effects on pesticide volatility. After a test period of 10 d the cumulative vapor loss ranged from minimum 6.9% (loamy sand) to maximum 23.1% (weakly loamy sand) of the applied 14C-terbutylazine. In the case of a silty loam it was shown that soil moisture had a strong effect on terbutylazine volatilization. Rising the soil water suction resulted in a drastic decline in volatility.


Received for publication September 22, 1998.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. E. Allaire, S. R. Yates, and F. F. Ernst
Effect of Soil Moisture and Irrigation on Propargyl Bromide Volatilization and Movement in Soil
Vadose Zone J., May 1, 2004; 3(2): 656 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. Wolters, V. Linnemann, M. Herbst, M. Klein, A. Schaffer, and H. Vereecken
Pesticide Volatilization from Soil: Lysimeter Measurements versus Predictions of European Registration Models
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2003; 32(4): 1183 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.