JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 28:397-403 (1999)
© 1999 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Troiano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Spurlock, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Troiano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Spurlock, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Troiano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Spurlock, F.

Empirical Modeling of Spatial Vulnerability Applied to a Norflurazon Retrospective Well Study in California

J. Troiano*, J. Marade and F. Spurlock

Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch, California, Dep. of Pesticide Regulation, 1020 N Street. Room 161, Sacramento, CA 95814.

* Corresponding author (jtroiano{at}cdpr.ca.gov).

ABSTRACT

One goal of mandated well monitoring in California is to search for residues of active ingredients previously undetected in the state's groundwater. The realization that pesticide residues move into groundwater via several different pathways has led us to develop an empirical approach to delineate vulnerable areas; major climatic and edaphic features of areas where pesticides residues have been detected in well water have been identified on a geographic basis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of our empirical model in a retrospective well- sampling study for norflurazon, a preemergence herbicide with physical-chemical properties that indicated potential to move offsite with water. In our modeling approach, sections of land, which are 2.59 km2 areas, were identified as having a greater potential for contamination based on soil and depth-to-groundwater (DGW) data. Wells were sampled from a subset of these sections where use of norflurazon was historically the greatest. Norflurazon residue was detected in 8 of 43 wells sampled in Fresno County, California, and in concentrations ranging from 0.07 to 0.69 µg L–1. This result was considered highly successful because residues had not been detected in 18 previous California groundwater studies for other active ingredients, some of which had been detected in other state and federal sampling programs. Location of sampling sites in these previous 18 California studies was based only on pesticide use data. The detections of norflurazon in this study indicated that, even though using an empirical modeling approach appeared to be unorthodox, it enabled us to effectively identify vulnerable areas.


Received for publication November 18, 1997.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
J. Troiano, D. Weaver, J. Marade, F. Spurlock, M. Pepple, C. Nordmark, and D. Bartkowiak
Summary of Well Water Sampling in California to Detect Pesticide Residues Resulting from Nonpoint-Source Applications
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2001; 30(2): 448 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.