JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 28:187-193 (1999)
© 1999 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Balogh, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by King, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Balogh, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by King, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Balogh, J. C.

Modeling Evaluation of Alternative Management Practices and Reclaimed Water for Turfgrass Systems

K. W. King*

USDA-ARS, 808 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502.

J. C. Balogh

Spectrum Research Inc., 4915 E. Superior St., Ste. 100, Duluth, MN 55804.

* Corresponding author (king{at}brcsun0.tamu.edu).

ABSTRACT

The use of reclaimed water for turfgrass irrigation is being implemented to conserve potable water supplies. Reclaimed water coupled with alternative management strategies may reduce offsite loadings of fertilizers and pesticides. The Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) water quality model was used to evaluate alternative management practices and reclaimed water for a southern turfgrass system. One green and fairway were modeled for a 65-yr period of climatic record with four treatments. Specifically, the treatments were normal water normal management (NWNM), normal water reduced management (NWRM), reclaimed water normal management (RWNM), and reclaimed water reduced management (RWRM). Surface and subsurface nitrate (NO3-N), fenamiphos (ethyl 3-methyl-4-(methylthio)phenyl (1-methylethyl)phosphoramidate), and MSMA (monosodium methanearsonate) losses were evaluated. Significant differences were predicted in NO3-N runoff and leachate losses from green management. Mean annual NO3-N losses from runoff were 2.85 kg ha–1 (NWNM) and 2.05 kg ha–1 (RWRM). Significant reductions in mean annual surface and subsurface NO3-N losses from fairway conditions were simulated when comparing NWNM (5.11 kg ha–1 surface; 1.68 kg ha–1 subsurface) to RWRM (2.69 kg ha–1 surface; 0.90 kg ha–1 subsurface). The cited differences in NO3-N losses in runoff and leachate from green and fairway conditions were attributed primarily to irrigation strategies and excess rainfall. Predicted average annual pesticide recovery in runoff and leachate was <0.01% of applied and no significant differences were predicted with respect to treatments. This modeling strategy provides valuable insight into the relative efficacy of implementing reduced management practices for turfgrass systems.


Received for publication March 17, 1998.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.