JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 27:1418-1427 (1998)
© 1998 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doussan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Detay, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Doussan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Detay, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Doussan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Detay, M.

River-Groundwater Exchanges, Bank Filtration, and Groundwater Quality: Ammonium Behavior

C. Doussan*

INRA, Science du Sol, Domaine Saint Paul, Site Agroparc, 84914 Avignon cedex 9, France;

E. Ledoux

Centre d'Informatique Geologique, Ecole des Mines, 77305 Fontainebleau, France;

M. Detay

Lyonnaise des Eaux, Cholet, France.

* Corresponding author (doussan{at}avignon.inra.fr).

ABSTRACT

In many countries, bank-filtrated water is an important component of the drinking water production. In this case, most of the water pumped from the alluvial aquifers originates from the adjacent river. Bank-filtration is generally considered beneficial both quantitatively and qualitatively. However, in some cases bank filtration can cause deleterious effects to groundwater quality. This paper describes such a case, focusing on ammonium (NH4) concentrations. The data were gathered at an experimental bank-filtration site which is part of a large well field along the Seine River (France). At this site, groundwater was sampled along a flow line path and pore water of river bed sediments was collected with peepers or by centrifuging core samples. The pore waters of the superficial river bed sediments have high ammonium concentrations (>30 mg NH4 L–1) whereas, in the groundwater, these concentrations are lower (≤20 mg NH4 L–1), with higher concentrations near the bank. The high NH4 concentration in the sediment is related to the heavy organic load in the river and the mineralization of this organic matter by benthic microflora. Among the different mechanisms that influence NH4 transport and retention in the porous medium, it emerges that sorption by the alluvial sediments (Kd = 1 – 10 x 10–3 m3 kg–1), or even the chalk (Kd = 48 x 10–3 m3 kg–1) seems to be effective in retaining NH4. This is illustrated by a model of NH4 transfer with retardation adapted to the conditions of the site. Precipitation of NH4 salts is probably not involved in regulating NH4 concentrafion at this site.


Received for publication September 23, 1997.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.