JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 27:1367-1375 (1998)
© 1998 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saporito, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lanyon, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Saporito, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lanyon, L. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Saporito, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lanyon, L. E.

Evaluating Management and Soil and Weather Contributions to Potential Nitrate Leaching from a Pennsylvania Dairy Farm using NLEAP

L. S. Saporito and L. E. Lanyon*

Department of Agronomy, 116 ASI Bldg., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802.

* Corresponding author (lel{at}psu.edu).

ABSTRACT

Developing approaches to reduce nitrate-N (NO3-N) leaching from farms requires an understanding of the factors influencing the potential for NO3-N leaching. An annual screening analysis, NLEAP, was used to determine NO3-N leaching potential (NL) from a 110-ha mixed crop and dairy farm in a central Pennsylvania limestone valley for each of 9 yr. The farmer management goal was to meet the animal and crop needs as much as posssible with internal farm resources. Nitrate-N leaching potential was estimated from annual field N balances (NAL) and a yearly soil and weather factor (SWF) based on winter and summer rainfall, soil bulk density, rooting depth, and soil hydrologic group. Primary crops grown were corn (Zea mays L) and alfalfa-timothy (Medicago sativa L.-Phleum pratense L.). A geographic information system was used to calculate and map SWF, NAL, and NL The magnitutude and aerial distribution of field SWF was significantly different (Kolomogorov-Smirnov, D-max, p = 0.05) for most year-to-year comparisons. The excess of N inputs over outputs (field NAL) was low for all fields and did not vary significantly during the 9-yr period. The NL was <25 kg ha–1 for 75% of the farm and <50 kg ha–1 for 85% of the farm for all years of the study. The careful and conservative N management strategy by the farmer, reflected in the consistently low NAL, had an overriding impact on potential NO3-N leaching from the farm.


Received for publication October 6, 1997.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. B. Ferguson, R. M. Lark, and G. P. Slater
Approaches to Management Zone Definition for Use of Nitrification Inhibitors
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2003; 67(3): 937 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
E. A. Nord and L. E. Lanyon
Managing Material Transfer and Nutrient Flow in an Agricultural Watershed
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 562 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.