JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 27:1294-1300 (1998)
© 1998 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L. Q.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, L. Q.

Comparison of Four USEPA Digestion Methods for Trace Metal Analysis Using Certified and Florida Soils

Ming Chen

Commission for Integrated Survey of Natural Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Building 917, P.O. Box 9717, Beijing 100101, People's Republic of China;

Lena Q. Ma*

Soil and Water Science Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0290.

* Corresponding author (qma{at}gnv.ifas.ufl.edu).

ABSTRACT

It is critical to compare existing sample digestion methods for evaluating soil contamination and remediation. USEPA Methods 3050, 3051, 3051a, and 3052 were used to digest standard reference materials and representative Florida surface soils. Fifteen trace metals (Ag, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, and Zn), and six macro elements (Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, and P) were analyzed. Precise analysis was achieved for all elements except for Cd, Mo, Se, and Sb in NIST SRMs 2704 and 2709 by USEPA Methods 3050 and 3051, and for all elements except for As, Mo, Sb, and Se in NIST SRM 2711 by USEPA Method 3052. No significant differences were observed for the three NIST SRMs between the microwave-assisted USEPA Methods 3051 and 3051a and the conventional USEPA Method 3050 except for Hg, Sb, and Se. USEPA Method 3051a provided comparable values for NIST SRMs certified using USEPA Method 3050. However, for method correlation coefficients and elemental recoveries in 40 Florida surface soils, USEPA Method 3051a was an overall better alternative for Method 3050 than was Method 3051. Among the four digestion methods, the microwave-assisted USEPA Method 3052 achieved satisfactory recoveries for all elements except As and Mg using NIST SRM 2711. This total-total digestion method provided greater recoveries for 12 elements Ag, Be, Cr, Fe, K, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, and Zn, but lower recoveries for Mg in Florida soils than did the total-recoverable digestion methods (3050, 3051, and 3051a).


NOTES

Contributions from the Soil and Water Science Dep., Univ. of Florida and the Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Series no. R-06187.

Received for publication November 24, 1997.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Sundaram, B. Rathinasabapathi, L. Q. Ma, and B. P. Rosen
An Arsenate-activated Glutaredoxin from the Arsenic Hyperaccumulator Fern Pteris vittata L. Regulates Intracellular Arsenite
J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2008; 283(10): 6095 - 6101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. Appel, L. Q. Ma, R. D. Rhue, and W. Reve
Selectivities of Potassium-Calcium and Potassium-Lead Exchange in Two Tropical Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2003; 67(6): 1707 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
X. Cao, L. Q. Ma, M. Chen, D. W. Hardison Jr., and W. G. Harris
Weathering of Lead Bullets and Their Environmental Effects at Outdoor Shooting Ranges
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 526 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Chen and L. Q. Ma
Comparison of Three Aqua Regia Digestion Methods for Twenty Florida Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2001; 65(2): 491 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.