JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 27:869-877 (1998)
© 1998 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patni, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jui, P. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Patni, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jui, P. Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Patni, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jui, P. Y.

Groundwater Quality under Conventional and No Tillage: I. Nitrate, Electrical Conductivity, and pH

N. K. Patni*,, L. Masse and P. Y. Jui

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON Canada K1A 0C6.

* Corresponding author (patnin{at}em.agr.ca).

ABSTRACT

The use of conservation tillage is increasing in North America, but information on its effect on water quality in cold climatic regions is limited. To obtain such information, the effect of no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) treatments on nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) concentration, specific electrical conductivity (EC), and pH in shallow groundwater (1.2, 1.8, 3.0, and 4.6 m depths) was studied over four successive crop years in corn fields (loam soil) of approximately 3 ha each, located in eastern Ontario. Water table elevation was also monitored during three crop years. Average NO3-N concentration at the 1.2, 1.8, and 4.6 m depths was consistently higher under CT than under NT in every crop year and every season. However, the effect of tillage was not significant at P < 0.05. Nitrate concentration decreased significantly with depth. It was about two to three times the drinking water limit of 10 mg/L as NO3-N at the 1.2, 1.8, and 3.0 m depths. At the 4.6 m depth, NO3-N concentrations were mostly low but increased with time. Changes in water table elevation appeared to affect NO3-N concentrations at the 1.2 m depth under NT only. At a given depth, EC and pH of groundwater were not affected by tillage treatment. However, within each tillage treatment, values increased significantly with depth. Results from this study indicated a large spatial variability in NO3-N and EC values in groundwater, which could have masked small tillage effects. More intensive temporal and spatial sampling may be required to establish tillage treatment effects, if any.


NOTES

N.K. Patni, current address: Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agassiz, BC V0M 1A0 Canada.

Centre for Food and Animal Research Contribution no. 2427.

Received for publication April 14, 1997.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
D. B. Jaynes, T. C. Kaspar, T. B. Moorman, and T. B. Parkin
In Situ Bioreactors and Deep Drain-Pipe Installation to Reduce Nitrate Losses in Artificially Drained Fields
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 429 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. A. Elmi, C. Madramootoo, M. Egeh, A. Liu, and C. Hamel
Environmental and Agronomic Implications of Water Table and Nitrogen Fertilization Management
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2002; 31(6): 1858 - 1867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.