JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 27:355-363 (1998)
© 1998 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juang, K.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Juang, K.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D.-Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Juang, K.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D.-Y.

A Comparison of Three Kriging Methods Using Auxiliary Variables in Heavy-Metal Contaminated Soils

Kai-Wei Juang and Dar-Yuan Lee*

Graduate Institute of Agricultural Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.

* Corresponding author (dylee{at}ccms.ntu.edu.tw).

ABSTRACT

Characterization of the spatial distribution of pollutants in contaminated soils is important for risk assessment and soil reclamation. In this study, three kriging methods using auxiliary variables, cokriging, kriging combined with regression, and kriging combined with Q-mode factor analysis, were used for interpolation of heavy metal concentrations in a contaminated site. The three interpolation methods were evaluated for whether or not they could make better use of an auxiliary variable for estimation of the spatial distribution of heavy metals. A heavy metal contaminated site about 10 ha in area, situated in Taoyuan, Taiwan, was studied. The results demonstrate that better use of the auxiliary variable in interpolations of the target variable was made using kriging combined with regression compared to using cokriging or kriging combined with Q-mode factor analysis. The results also show that the spatial distribution patterns of the target variables estimated using kriging combined with Q-mode factor analysis were more similar to those estimated using kriging combined with regression than were those estimated using cokriging. In addition, kriging combined with regression and kriging combined with Q-mode factor analysis could avoid negative estimates, which occur in cokriging. Moreover, both of them were more robust than cokriging. Simultaneous estimation of spatial distributions of several target variables using an auxiliary variable was demonstrated for the kriging combined with Q-mode factor analysis procedure. However, for only one target variable, kriging combined with regression was simpler and less cumbersome than cokriging.


Received for publication May 12, 1997.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.