HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Parry, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Parry, R. Agricola Articles by Parry, R.

Agricultural Phosphorus and Water Quality: A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Perspective

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Development, 2121, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460.

^* Corresponding author (parry.roberta{at}epamail.epa.gov).

ABSTRACT

Pollution of lakes, rivers, and estuaries from agricultural sources of P is a major water quality problem in the USA. This paper explains the regulatory and nonregulatory programs developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to implement its legal mandate to control water pollution from these sources. The Clean Water Act defines concentrated animal feeding operations as point sources of pollution that are required to obtain permits to discharge into waters of the USA. All other agricultural sources are considered nonpoint and are not regulated under federal law. The USEPA prorides grant money to the states to develop and implement nonpoint source programs. The Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 requires coastal states to adopt nonpoint management measures that are backed by enforceable policies and mechanisms. For water bodies that continue to be impaired despite the basic implementation of these laws and other programs, states are required to develop a total maximum daily load (TMDL). The TMDL process is the quantitative basis for reaching water quality standards. The USEPA is putting a new emphasis on controlling nutrient pollution sources to meet the goal of the Clean Water Act.

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and are not official EPA policy.

Received for publication February 17, 1997.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. R. Sistani, G. E. Brink, and J. L. Oldham Managing broiler litter application rate and grazing to decrease watershed runoff losses. J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 718 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Dayton and N. T. Basta Use of Drinking Water Treatment Residuals as a Potential Best Management Practice to Reduce Phosphorus Risk Index Scores J. Environ. Qual., November 7, 2005; 34(6): 2112 - 2117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Dayton and N. T. Basta A Method for Determining the Phosphorus Sorption Capacity and Amorphous Aluminum of Aluminum-Based Drinking Water Treatment Residuals J. Environ. Qual., May 11, 2005; 34(3): 1112 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Cabot and P. Nowak Planned versus Actual Outcomes As a Result of Animal Feeding Operation Decisions for Managing Phosphorus J. Environ. Qual., April 20, 2005; 34(3): 761 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. E. Rhoton and J. M. Bigham Phosphate Adsorption by Ferrihydrite-Amended Soils J. Environ. Qual., April 20, 2005; 34(3): 890 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Stewart, D. W. Dibb, A. E. Johnston, and T. J. Smyth The Contribution of Commercial Fertilizer Nutrients to Food Production Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 1 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Hulke, W. R. Fehr, and G. A. Welke Agronomic and Seed Characteristics of Soybean with Reduced Phytate and Palmitate Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 2027 - 2031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. M. Easton and A. M. Petrovic Fertilizer Source Effect on Ground and Surface Water Quality in Drainage from Turfgrass J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 645 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Oltmans, W. R. Fehr, G. A. Welke, and S. R. Cianzio Inheritance of Low-Phytate Phosphorus in Soybean Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 433 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Shober and J. T. Sims Phosphorus Restrictions for Land Application of Biosolids: Current Status and Future Trends J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2003; 32(6): 1955 - 1964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Gaston, C. M. Drapcho, S. Tapadar, and J. L. Kovar Phosphorus Runoff Relationships for Louisiana Coastal Plain Soils Amended with Poultry Litter J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2003; 32(4): 1422 - 1429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Sims, R. O. Maguire, A. B. Leytem, K. L. Gartley, and M. C. Pautler Evaluation of Mehlich 3 as an Agri-Environmental Soil Phosphorus Test for the Mid-Atlantic United States of America Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 2016 - 2032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Penn and J. T. Sims Phosphorus Forms in Biosolids-Amended Soils and Losses in Runoff: Effects of Wastewater Treatment Process J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2002; 31(4): 1349 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.A. Torbert, T.C. Daniel, J.L. Lemunyon, and R.M. Jones Relationship of Soil Test Phosphorus and Sampling Depth to Runoff Phosphorus in Calcareous and Noncalcareous Soils J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2002; 31(4): 1380 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.J. Kimmell, G.M. Pierzynski, K.A. Janssen, and P.L. Barnes Effects of Tillage and Phosphorus Placement on Phosphorus Runoff Losses in a Grain Sorghum-Soybean Rotation J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2001; 30(4): 1324 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.O. Maguire, J.T. Sims, S.K. Dentel, F.J. Coale, and J.T. Mah Relationships between Biosolids Treatment Process and Soil Phosphorus Availability J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2001; 30(3): 1023 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]