JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 27:215-219 (1998)
© 1998 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eigenberg, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nienaber, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eigenberg, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nienaber, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eigenberg, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nienaber, J. A.

Geophysical Electromagnetic Survey Methods Applied to Agricultural Waste Sites

R. A. Eigenberg*, R. L. Korthals and J. A. Nienaber

USDA-ARS U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, P.O. Box 166, Clay Center, NE 68933.

* Corresponding author (eigenbrg{at}marcvm.marc.usda.gov)

ABSTRACT

This paper reports the use of electromagnetic (EM) instrumentation for surveying agronomic and waste treatment sites at locations previously profiled by soil coring for evaluation of nutrients in the soil profile. Surveys were made using a geophysical EM instrument capable of measuring conductivity 3 to 6 m below the surface of the ground with horizontal or vertical polarization. Two specific sites were analyzed to evaluate the effects of management practices: (i) An animal waste composting site with one section in use since 1985 and with expanded operation to another section in 1989 and (ii) A waste storage pond (operational in 1973) holding precipitation runoff from a cattle feedlot. Correlation analysis between the EM conductivity measurements and chemical analysis at both sites (concentrations of NH+4, NO3, CL, and P) show significant (P < 0.05) correlations for the ions while P did not show a significant correlation. The EM measures were able to distinguish the 6-yr-old site from the 10-yr-old site (P < 0.05). The results indicate that EM methods provide useful information for shallow subsurface surveys of livestock waste management facilities.


Received for publication December 30, 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. A. Eigenberg, S. M. Lesch, B. Woodbury, and J. A. Nienaber
Geospatial Methods for Monitoring a Vegetative Treatment Area Receiving Beef Feedlot Runoff
J. Environ. Qual., September 2, 2008; 37(5_Supplement): S-68 - S-77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.