HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wiltse, C. C. Articles by Banks, M. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wiltse, C. C. Articles by Banks, M. K. Agricola Articles by Wiltse, C. C. Articles by Banks, M. K.

Greenhouse Evaluation of Agronomic and Crude Oil-Phytoremediation Potential among Alfalfa Genotypes

Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506,
Dep. of Civil Engineering, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506.

^* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Phytoremediation is an effective, non-intrusive, and inexpensive means of remediating soils contaminated with organic chemicals. Different plant species have different remediation capabilities, so intraspecies variation may also exist. If intraspecific variation exists and is heritable, population improvement for performance in and phytoremediation of contaminated soils should be possible. The objectives of this study were (i) to determine if variability exists among alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genotypes for agronomic performance in and phytoremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil and (ii) to determine the effect of contaminated soil on the agronomic performance of alfalfa. In one greenhouse experiment, 20 genotypic clones were transplanted into 20 g kg^–1 crude oil-contaminated soil. After 1 yr, differences existed among genotypes for total forage yield (P < 0.05), maturity at harvest (P < 0.001), plant height (P < 0.01), and phytoremediation potential (P < 0.001). Degradation rates ranged from 33 to 56% among genotypes with 46% for the unvegetated control. Two genotypes had significantly greater degradation rates than that of the unvegetated control. In a second greenhouse experiment, eight genotypes from the previous experiment were compared with their clones in uncontaminated soil. After 1 yr, mean total forage yield in contaminated soil was 32% of the yield of the same clones in uncontaminated soil. Plants in contaminated soil also matured later and were shorter. Genotype variability was present for all traits but not on all evaluation dates. The results indicate that overall agronomic performance is reduced in contaminated soil, but variability exists among genotypes for growth in and phytoremediation of contaminated soils.

Current address: C.C. Wiltse, Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Sorghum Breeding and Genetics, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2474.

Contribution no. 97-94-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Received for publication November 9, 1996.