HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Elliott, J. A. Articles by Tollefson, L. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Elliott, J. A. Articles by Tollefson, L. C. Agricola Articles by Elliott, J. A. Articles by Tollefson, L. C.

Leaching and Preferential Flow of Clopyralid under Irrigation: Field Observations and Simulation Modeling

National Hydrology Research Institute, 11 Innovation Blvd., Saskatoon, SK, S7N 3H5, Canada;
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB; seconded to National Hydrology Research Institute, Saskatoon, SK;
Saskatchewan Irrigation Development Centre, Outlook, SK.

^* Corresponding author (elliottj{at}nhrisv.nhrc.sk.ec.gc.ca).

ABSTRACT

Pesticide leaching is a potential problem on irrigated land in Saskatchewan. This study examined a worst case scenario for leaching of the herbicide, clopyralid. Herbicide concentrations were measured in water samples from suction lysimeters and tile drain effluent during and after a leaching irrigation to remove salts. Clopyralid was found throughout the soil profile within 20 d of application and was detected in the first water flowing in the tile drains. Approximately 1.5% of the applied clopyralid was lost in the tile drain effluent. The presence of higher concentrations of clopyralid in tile drain water samples at 2 m than in lysimeter water samples taken from 1.5 and 1.8 m was attributed to preferential transport. Another indication of preferential flow was the disparity between measured soil hydraulic characteristics and the timing of the arrival of water in the tile drains. Good agreement between observed and simulated clopyralid distributions was obtained using a bimodal flow scenario with the LEACHM model. It assumed that 40% of the applied water moved through preferential flowpaths with saturated hydraulic conductivities two orders of magnitude greater than the bulk soil. Chemical moving with this water did not penetrate the soil matrix and was not accessed by suction lysimeters. The remaining 60% of applied water moved through the soil matrix according to measured hydraulic characteristics. The modeling approach described herbicide concentrations in the soil matrix and preferential flow from a large field integrated by tile drainage but would not be applicable in soil column studies or small plots.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. A. Fox, R. Malone, G. J. Sabbagh, and K. Rojas Interrelationship of Macropores and Subsurface Drainage for Conservative Tracer and Pesticide Transport J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 2281 - 2289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]