JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 26:1282-1287 (1997)
© 1997 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turin, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Turin, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, R. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Turin, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, R. S.

Sorption Behavior and Competition of Bromacil, Napropamide, and Prometryn

H. J. Turin*

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545;

R. S. Bowman

Department of Earth and Environmental Science and Geophysical Research Center, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801.

* Corresponding author (turin{at}lanl.gov).

ABSTRACT

Groundwater contamination by pesticides is a problem of major and increasing concern. Detailed field measurements reveal that leaching of pesticides from soils is often faster than predicted using simple models. This discrepancy is likely due to a combination of physical effects (e.g., preferential pathways) and complexities in the chemical sorption process. To address the issue of sorption complexity, a series of laboratory batch sorption studies have been conducted to determine the detailed sorption behavior of three herbicides, bromacil [5-bromo-6-methyl-3-(1-methylpropyl)-2,4(1H,3H)pyrimidinedione], napropamide [N,N-diethyl-2-(1-naphthalenyloxy)propanamide], and prometryn [N,N'-bis(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine], onto a sandy loam soil. The studies were designed to determine the extent of nonideal sorption behavior, specifically nonequilibrium, nonlinearity, sorption hysteresis, and solute-solute interactions. Results showed all three herbicides reached sorption equilibrium quickly, within 2 h. Both napropamide and prometryn were linearly sorbed, while bromacil sorption followed a Freundlich isotherm, with n = 0.92. All three herbicides displayed apparent sorption hysteresis. Bromacil and napropamide sorption decreased in the presence of the other herbicides, while prometryn sorption was unaffected. Contrary to most literature data, napropamide was more strongly sorbed than prometryn in these studies, due to the high pH of the soil. Results suggest that sorption nonlinearity and competition may increase field-scale transport velocities by 10% or more.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. Sander, Y. Lu, and J. J. Pignatello
A Thermodynamically Based Method to Quantify True Sorption Hysteresis
J. Environ. Qual., May 11, 2005; 34(3): 1063 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.