JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 25:1105-1111 (1996)
© 1996 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delgado, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mosier, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Delgado, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mosier, A. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Delgado, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mosier, A. R.

Mitigation Alternatives to Decrease Nitrous Oxides Emissions and Urea-Nitrogen Loss and Their Effect on Methane Flux

J. A. Delgado* and A. R. Mosier

USDA/ARS, P.O. Box E, Ft. Collins, CO 80522.

* Corresponding author (jdelgado{at}lamar.colostate.edu).

ABSTRACT

Nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) are greenhouse gases that are contributing to global warming potential. Nitrogen (N) fertilizer is one of the most important sources of anthropogenic N2O emissions. A field study was conducted to compare N-use efficiency and effect on N2O and CH4 flux, of urea, urea plus the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (U + DCD), and a control release fertilizer, polyolefin coated urea (POCU) in irrigated spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in northeastern Colorado. Each treatment received 90 kg urea-N ha–1 and microplots labeled with 15N-fertilizer were established. Average N2O emissions were 4.5, 5.2, 6.9, and 8.2 g N ha–1 d–1 for control, U + DCD, POCU, and urea, respectively. During the initial 21 d after fertilization, N2O emissions were reduced by 82 and 71% in the U + DCD and POCU treatments, respectively, but continued release of N fertilizer from POCU maintained higher N2O emissions through the remainder of the growing season. No treatment effect on CH4 oxidation in soils was observed. Fertilizer 15N found 50 to 110 cm below the soil surface was lower in the POCU and U + DCD treatments. At harvest, recovery of 15N-fertilizer in the plant-soil system was 98, 90, and 85% from POCU, urea, and U + DCD, respectively. Grain yield was 2.2, 2.5, and 2.7 Mg ha–1 for POCU, urea, and U + DCD, respectively. Dicyandiamide and POCU showed the potential to be used as mitigation alternatives to decrease N2O emissions from N fertilizer and movement of N out of the root zone, but N release from POCU does need to be formulated to better match crop growth demands.


Received for publication October 16, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
S. Haile-Mariam, H. P. Collins, and S. S. Higgins
Greenhouse Gas Fluxes from an Irrigated Sweet Corn (Zea mays L.)-Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Rotation
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 759 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. L. Lemke, Z. Zhong, C. A. Campbell, and R. Zentner
Can Pulse Crops Play a Role in Mitigating Greenhouse Gases from North American Agriculture?
Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1719 - 1725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.