JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 25:510-518 (1996)
© 1996 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fayer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fayer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, T. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fayer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, T. B.

Estimating Recharge Rates for a Groundwater Model Using a GIS

M. J. Fayer*, G. W. Gee, M. L. Rockhold, M. D. Freshley and T. B. Walters

Hydrology Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352.

* Corresponding author (mj__fayer{at}pnl.gov).

ABSTRACT

Some of the defense wastes at the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State are stored in the vadose zone. It is possible that natural recharge could mobilize and transport the contaminants in these wastes to the groundwater, as well as influence groundwater velocities and directions. The objective of this study was to estimate the areal distribution of natural recharge for use as a boundary condition for a groundwater flow and transport model. A geographic information system (GIS) was used to identify all possible combinations of soil type and vegetation and assign to each an appropriate estimate of recharge. The strategy was to assign estimates based on field data and supplement with simulation results only when necessary. The estimated rates varied from 0.7 to 127.1 mm/yr. The order of preference for assigning estimates was lysimetry > water content measurements > tracers > modeling, based on qualitative estimates of the relative error of each method as applied. The GIS software was used to estimate the annual recharge volume attributable to specific soil-vegetation combinations. The total annual recharge volume was 8.47 x 109 L for the 765 km2 portion of the site containing the major waste storage areas. This volume is from 2 to 10 times higher than estimates of runoff and groundwater flow from adjacent higher elevations and is equivalent to facility discharges in 1992. The recharge map showed the impact of a 1984 fire on increasing recharge; it also illustrated the higher recharge rates associated with disturbed soils in the waste storage areas.


Received for publication April 14, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
G. W. Gee, J. M. Keller, and A. L. Ward
Measurement and Prediction of Deep Drainage from Bare Sediments at a Semiarid Site
Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2005; 4(1): 32 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.