JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 25:273-278 (1996)
© 1996 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. E.

Response of White Clover to Ozone in Different Environments

Allen S. Heagle* and Richard A. Reinert

USDA-ARS, Air Quality Res. Unit, 1509 Varsity Drive, Raleigh, NC 27606 and Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State Univ.;

Joseph E. Miller

USDA-ARS, Air Quality Res. Unit, 1509 Varsity Drive, Raleigh, NC 27606 and Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ.

* Corresponding author (asheagle{at}unity.ncsu.edu).

ABSTRACT

The value of research on effects of O3 done in greenhouse or field exposure systems is often questioned because chamber environments may affect plant response. Foliar injury, chlorophyll, and forage weight responses of two clones of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) to ambient O3 were compared for plants grown in charcoal-filtered (CF) and nonfiltered air (NF) in greenhouse and open-top field chambers and in ambient air (AA) plots at Raleigh, NC. One clone is sensitive to O3 (NC-S), whereas the other is resistant (NC-R). Comparisons of individual clone responses in CF vs. NF treatments in the greenhouse and in the field and the proportional response of the clones (defined as the NC-S/NC-R response ratio) were used to indicate the relative response to O3 in the different environments. Foliar injury and chlorophyll responses of NC-S to O3 were similar in the NF greenhouse, NF open-top chambers, and in AA. However, for individual harvests, the percentage decrease in NC-S forage weight in NF compared with CF was 7 to 23% greater in the greenhouse than in open-top chambers. The NC-S/NC-R forage ratios indicated that clover response to O3 in NF open-top field chambers was the same as in AA. Large environmental differences between greenhouse and open-top chambers apparently caused differences in plant responses to O3, whereas relatively small environmental differences between open-top chambers and ambient air did not.


NOTES

Cooperative investigations of the USDA-ARS and the North Carolina State Univ. Funded in part by the North Carolina Agric. Res. Service and the USEPA through an Interagency Agreement (no. DW123934170-6) in support of the Agricultural Lands Resource Group of the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment program. The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agric. Res. Service or the USDA of the products named, nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned. This paper has not been subject to USEPA peer review and should not be construed to represent the policy of the agency.

Received for publication June 1, 1995.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.