HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Singh, P. Articles by Ahuja, L. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Singh, P. Articles by Ahuja, L. R. Agricola Articles by Singh, P. Articles by Ahuja, L. R.

Calibration and Evaluation of Subsurface Drainage Component of RZWQM V.2.5

Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Dep., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011;

K. E. Johnsen, Research Associate and L. R. Ahuja, Research Leader

USDA-ARS, Great Plains Systems Research Unit, Ft. Collins, CO.

^* Corresponding author (psingh{at}iastate.edu).

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to calibrate and evaluate the subsurface drain flow component of the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM; Version 2.5) for four tillage-systems: chisel plow (CP), moldboard plow (MB), no-tillage (NT), and ridge-tillage (RT). Measured subsurface drain flow data for 1990 was used for model calibration. Main parameters calibrated were lateral saturated hydraulic conductivity, and effective porosity. Subsurface drain flow predictions were made using calibrated parameters and compared with measured subsurface drain flows for 1991 and 1992. Measured subsurface drain flow data for all 3 yrs was obtained from the Nashua Water Quality Site in Iowa. The model, in general, showed a good agreement between measured and predicted subsurface drain flow values, although discrepancies existed for several days of a given year. Coefficients of determination calculated for predicted vs. measured daily subsurface drain flows ranged from 0.51 to 0.68 for 1990, 0.70 to 0.78 for 1991, and 0.54 to 0.69 for 1992. Simulated tillage effect on subsurface drain flows for 1991 and 1992 were consistent with those for calibrated year 1990 (maximum subsurface drain flow was observed under NT and minimum under MB). However, observed tillage effects varied from year to year, indicating a change in soil hydraulic properties, e.g., macroporosity. Other factors that could have caused the discrepancies between measured and simulated subsurface drain flows were: groundwater flux due to natural gradient, deep seepage, inaccuracies involved in the estimation of breakpoint rainfall data, and spatial variability in soil properties.

Journal Paper no. J-16215 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, IA. Project no. 3003.

Received for publication March 29, 1995.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Fortin, E. Gagnon-Bertrand, L. Vezina, and M. Rompre Preferential Bromide and Pesticide Movement to Tile Drains under Different Cropping Practices J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2002; 31(6): 1940 - 1952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]