JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 25:136-144 (1996)
© 1996 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paige, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hakonson, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Paige, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hakonson, T. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Paige, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hakonson, T. E.

Calibration and Testing of Simulation Models for Evaluation of Trench Cap Designs

G. B. Paige*, J. J. Stone and L. J. Lane

USDA-ARS, Southwest Watershed Research Center, 2000 E. Allen Rd., Tucson, AZ 85719;

T. E. Hakonson

Center for Ecological Risk Assessment and Manage., Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523.

* Corresponding author (ginger{at}tucson.ars.ag.gov).

ABSTRACT

A prototype decision support system (PDSS) using multi-objective decision theory and embedded simulation models is being developed to evaluate landfill cover designs for low-level radioactive waste disposal sites. To evaluate the performance of the PDSS, the simulation models, which are used to parameterize the decision model when data are not available, must be calibrated and tested. The two linked simulation models embedded in the PDSS are the HELP (hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance) and CREAMS (chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems) models. Data from a field demonstration study at Hill Air Force Base were used to calibrate the simulation models. The models were calibrated using water balance and erosion parameters for two alternative designs, a control soil cover and a modified USEPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act design. Simulations were run using the calibrated model parameters for a 200-yr period to evaluate the long-term performance of the models. The progressive annual average for all of the output parameters was within the 95% confidence limits of the long-term mean by Year 60 for both of the cover designs evaluated. The results of the calibration and long-term evaluation of the simulation models were reasonable for the length of the data set. To fully validate and test the simulation models, other data sets of landfill covers in a variety of climates are needed.


Received for publication March 9, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
M. H. Young, W. Albright, K. F. Pohlmann, G. Pohll, W. H. Zachritz, S. Zitzer, D. S. Shafer, I. Nester, and L. Oyelowo
Incorporating Parametric Uncertainty in the Design of Alternative Landfill Covers in Arid Regions
Vadose Zone J., May 26, 2006; 5(2): 742 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
D. D. Breshears, J. W. Nyhan, and D. W. Davenport
Ecohydrology Monitoring and Excavation of Semiarid Landfill Covers a Decade after Installation
Vadose Zone J., August 16, 2005; 4(3): 798 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.