HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Howell, J. M. Articles by Cornelius, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Howell, J. M. Articles by Cornelius, P. Agricola Articles by Howell, J. M. Articles by Cornelius, P.

Fecal Bacteria in Agricultural Waters of the Bluegrass Region of Kentucky

Department of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091.

^* Corresponding author (mscoyn00{at}ukcc.uky.edu).

ABSTRACT

Agricultural runoff influenced by nonpoint pollution frequently exceeds the USEPA standards for bacterial contamination of primary contact water (200 fecal coliforms/100 mL). Few studies have evaluated the effect of cattle (Bos taurus) grazing on fecal contamination of ground water in the karst topography of central Kentucky. Our objectives were to: (i) observe the extent and pattern of fecal bacteria in agricultural waters from two central Kentucky watersheds; (ii) determine if monthly sampling accurately assessed the extent and variability of fecal contamination; and (iii) assess the fecal coliform/fecal streptococci ratio (FC/FS) as an indicator of fecal bacteria source. Springs, streams, and wells in two agricultural watersheds typical of central Kentucky were monitored for fecal coliform and fecal streptococci from December 1991 to January 1993. Springs and wells exceeded primary contact water standards, between 28 and 74% of the time; streams exceeded water quality standards between 87 and 100% of the time. When fecal bacteria were present, rainfall rapidly moved them from the soil surface into spring and well water. At two springs in Fleming county, only 29% of samples exceeded primary contact standards before cattle were present; 80% exceeded standards after cattle began grazing the surrounding pasture. Monthly sampling adequately reflected the extent of fecal contamination in our study, which had relatively continuous cattle grazing. Although the FC/FS ratio identified domestic animal contamination sources, it did not distinguish between domestic animal and human sources of contamination.

Contribution of the Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Kentucky. Published as paper 94-3-56 with approval of the Director of the Kentucky Agric. Exp. Stn., Lexington.

Received for publication May 23, 1994.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Siegford, W. Powers, and H. G. Grimes-Casey Environmental Aspects of Ethical Animal Production Poult. Sci., February 1, 2008; 87(2): 380 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Stewart and J. Skousen Water Quality Changes in a Polluted Stream over a Twenty-Five-Year Period J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 654 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. V. Gagliardi and J. S. Karns Leaching of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Diverse Soils under Various Agricultural Management Practices Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 1, 2000; 66(3): 877 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text]