HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Turton, D. J. Articles by de Jesus Návar, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Turton, D. J. Articles by de Jesus Návar, J. Agricola Articles by Turton, D. J. Articles by de Jesus Návar, J.

Old and New Water in Subsurface Flow from a Forest Soil Block

008C Agric. Hall Dep. of Forestry, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078;

Donald R. Barnes, Jr.

115 Plant Science, Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701;

Jose de Jesus Návar

Apartado, Postal 136, Dep. of Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autonomia de Nuevo León, Linares, NL 67700 México.

^* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

In order to understand how infiltrating water mixes with water and solutes already present in the soil, percentages of old and new water in subsurface flow from a forest soil block subjected to simulated rainfall were studied. A rainfall simulator was used to apply simulated rainfalls of four intensities 6.3, 4.3, 2.8, and 1.3 cm h^–1. Each intensity was repeated four times. Sodium bromide was added to the first replicate, but not the two following replicates to insure that old and new water had different chemical signatures. Subsurface flow was measured at four depths, 14, 26, 44, and 64 cm using a system of collection troughs and tipping buckets. Discrete water samples for bromide analysis were taken at 1- to 10-min intervals throughout each simulation. Old water percentages declined as the block was wetted and reached a minimum when peak subsurface flow was achieved. Minimum old water percentages during the simulations ranged from 0% for the 6.3 cm h^–1 simulation to 28% for the 1.3 cm h^–1 simulation. After rainfall stopped subsurface flow declined rapidly and old water percentages increased. Total subsurface flow was composed of 8.0, 3.7, 3.9, and 31% old water for simulated intensities of 6.3, 4.3, 2.8, and 1.3 cm h^–1, respectively, indicating a trend of increasing old water with decreasing rainfall intensity. Rapid subsurface flow through soil macropores was the most likely mechanism of new water release.