HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, E. H. Articles by Tingey, D. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lee, E. H. Articles by Tingey, D. T. Agricola Articles by Lee, E. H. Articles by Tingey, D. T.

Attainment and Effects Issues Regarding Alternative Secondary Ozone Air Quality Standards

ManTech Environmental Res. Services Corp., USEPA Environ. Res. Lab., 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333;

William E. Hogsett and David T. Tingey

USEPA, Environ. Res. Lab., 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333.

^* Corresponding author (henry{at}heart.cor.epa.gov).

ABSTRACT

The present secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for O₃, established in 1979, is based on limited information from a few field studies on vegetation and may not be protective of crop damage due to O₃, alone or in combination with other pollutants. Considerable information from field studies conducted in the past decade indicate that there is poor functional correspondence between agricultural production and the air quality index of the current secondary NAAQS for O₃. Because the current O₃ NAAQS is based on data for extreme values of air quality, the index (or form) of the NAAQS ignores key features of hourly exposure data that are desirable and important to minimizing the risk of crop damage. Previous analyses of existing vegetation effects data indicate that exposure indices that cumulated the hourly O₃ concentrations over the season, as well as preferentially weighted the higher concentrations appear to have major advantages over the mean and peak indices on the basis of statistical fits to the data. The peak-weighted, cumulative indicators whose form and level are determined from crop studies were found useful in achieving a target production level that is higher than that of the current O₃ NAAQS indicator with fewer violations. These alternative air quality indicators compare favorably with the current O₃ NAAQS in terms of protection against adverse welfare effects and air quality properties to better identify areas having adequate air quality.