|
|
||||||||
formerly Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, currently International Sports Turf Institute, College Station, Texas 77843,
Dep. of Botany and Plant Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521.
* Corresponding author.
ABSTRACT
Turfgrasses have been utilized by humans to enhance their environment for more than 10 centuries. The complexity and comprehensiveness of these environmental benefits that improve our quality-of-life are just now being quantitatively documented through research. Turfgrass benefits may be divided into (i) functional, (ii) recrcational, and (iii) aesthetic components. Specific functional benefits include: excellent soil erosion control and dust stabilization thereby protecting a vital soil resource; improved recharge and quality protection of groundwater, plus flood control; enhanced entrapment and biodegradation of synthetic organic compounds; soil improvement that includes CO2 conversion; accelerated restoration of disturbed soils; substantial urban heat dissipation-temperature moderation; reduced noise, glare, and visual pollution problems; decreased noxious pests and allergy-related pollens; safety in vehicle operation on roadsides and engine longevity on airfields; lowered fire hazard via open, green turfed firebreaks; and improved security of sensitive installations provided by high visibility zones. The recrcational benefits include a low-cost surface for outdoor sport and leisure activities, enhanced physical health of participants, and a unique low-cost cushion against personal impact injuries. The aesthetic benefits include enhanced beauty and attractiveness; a complimentary relationship to the total landscape ecosystem of flowers, shrubs and trees; improved mental health with a positive therapeutic impact, social harmony and stability; improved work productivity; and an overall better quality-of-life, especially in densely populated urban areas.
Contribution of Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. TA no. 30759.
Received for publication January 29, 1993.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. S. Walker, C. A. Bigelow, D. R. Smith, G. E. Van Scoyoc, and Z. J. Reicher Aboveground Responses of Cool-Season Lawn Species to Nitrogen Rates and Application Timings Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1225 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Shearman Fifty Years of Splendor in the Grass Crop Sci., September 8, 2006; 46(5): 2218 - 2229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Annicchiarico, L. Russi, E. Piano, and F. Veronesi Cultivar Adaptation across Italian Locations in Four Turfgrass Species Crop Sci., January 24, 2006; 46(1): 264 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wu, R.L. Green, G. Liu, M.V. Yates, P. Pacheco, J. Gan, and S.R. Yates Partitioning and Persistence of Trichlorfon and Chlorpyrifos in a Creeping Bentgrass Putting Green J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2002; 31(3): 889 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.S. Gardner, B.E. Branham, and D.W. Lickfeldt Effect of Turfgrass on Soil Mobility and Dissipation of Cyproconazole Crop Sci., September 1, 2000; 40(5): 1333 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J.W. Roy, G.W. Parkin, and C. Wagner-Riddle Water Flow in Unsaturated Soil Below Turfgrass: Observations and LEACHM (within EXPRES) Predictions Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 86 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Vadose Zone Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | ||||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal |