JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 23:292-298 (1994)
© 1994 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wienhold, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gish, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wienhold, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gish, T. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wienhold, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gish, T. J.

Effect of Formulation and Tillage Practice on Volatilization of Atrazine and Alachlor

Brian J. Wienhold* and Timothy J. Gish

USDA-ARS, Hydrology Lab., Natural Resources Institute, Beltsville, MD 20705.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Conservation tillage practices are being implemented by many farmers to conserve water and soil resources. These practices may modify the soil surface in ways that differentially effect dissipation of pesticide when compared to conventionally tilled fields. We measured volatilization of atrazine [2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine] and alachlor [2-chloro-2'-6'-diethyl-n-(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] applied as either an experimental starch-encapsulated formulation or as a commercial formulation, containing atrazine as a wettable powder and microencapsulated alachlor, to adjacent no-till and conventionally tilled corn fields in Maryland. Both formulations were applied at the same rate; 1.7 kg ha–1 for atrazine and 2.8 kg ha–1 for alachlor. After 35 d, cumulative volatilization of alachlor from conventionally tilled fields was 14% of that applied for both formulations. Cumulative volatilization of alachlor was less from no-till fields with 9% of the commercial formulation and 4% of the starch-encapsulated formulation being lost. After 35 d, cumulative volatilization of the commercial formulation of atrazine from the conventionally tilled field was 9% of that applied compared with 4% of that applied to the no-till field. Starch encapsulation reduced volatilization losses of atrazine to <2% of that applied for both tillage practices. Starch encapsulation appears to be a viable formulation modification for reducing volatilization losses of herbicides, especially from no-till fields.


Received for publication June 1, 1993.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.