HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blaylock, M. J. Articles by James, B. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Blaylock, M. J. Articles by James, B. R. Agricola Articles by Blaylock, M. J. Articles by James, B. R.

Selenite and Selenate Quantification by Hydride Generation-Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Ion Chromatography, and Colorimetry

Dep. of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, P.O. Box 3354, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3354;

Bruce R. James

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.

^* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The need for a routine, inexpensive method with nanomolar detection limits for soluble SeO^2–₃ and SeO^2–₄ is increasing as Se research on soil-plant-water systems intensifies and speciation of Se valence states is required. This study was undertaken to compare hydride generation-atomic absorption spectrometry (HGAAS), colorimetry using 2,3-diaminonaphthalene (DAN), and ion chromatography (IC) as suitable methods for analysis of SeO^2–₃ and SeO^2–₄ in soil extracts and water samples. Selenium standards in solutions of either 1.0 mM KH₂PO₄, CaSO₄, and KNO₃, or in distilled water were analyzed to determine detection limits (DL), limits of quantitation (LOQ), and practicality for routine use of the above methods. A 0.1 mM K₂HPO₄/KH₂PO₄ soil extract spiked with 2.0 or 20 µM SeO^2–₃ and SeO^2–₄ was also used to compare the precision of the three methods. The HGAAS method was the most sensitive (0.212 absorbance units/µM) and had the lowest DL for SeO²₃ (0.03 µmol Se/L) of the three methods employed. Detection limits for the DAN and IC methods were significantly higher (18 and 0.24 µmol Se/L, respectively). Poor reproducibility between methods was obtained for SeO^2–₄ content of the soil extract containing 20 µM SeO^2–₄, with concentrations ranging from 9.1 ± 1.2 µmol/L determined by HGAAS to 24.6 ± 0.05 µmol/L by IC. The variability and poor recovery of SeO^2–₄ was due to variabilty in efficiency of the HCl reduction required to reduce SeO^2–₄ to SeO^2–₃ before analysis in the HGAAS and DAN procedures. Selenium determinations in samples where low detection limits (<0.1 µM) are required are most effectively accomplished with HGAAS. Colorimetry requires greater effort and time from the analyst to obtain the low detection limits of HGAAS, but is useful in that only a visible light spectrometer is required. Ion chromatography is capable of automated determinations of Se^2–₃ and SeO^2–₄ directly in combination with other ions of interest and may be appropriate for soil solution Se analysis where Se speciation is required.

Contribution of the Maryland Agric. Exp. Stn. Sci. Art. no. A6380.

Received for publication June 12, 1992.