HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kraske, C. R. Articles by Fernandez, I. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kraske, C. R. Articles by Fernandez, I. J. Agricola Articles by Kraske, C. R. Articles by Fernandez, I. J.

Biogeochemical Responses of a Forested Watershed to Both Clearcut Harvesting and Papermill Sludge Application

Dep. of Plant, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469.

^* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The biogeochemical responses of a forested watershed to both clearcut harvesting and papermill sludge application were evaluated. A mixed northern hardwood and conifer stand in Letter E Township, ME, was clearcut during the winter of 1985–1986. Harvest residues were windrowed, and red pine (Pinus resinosa Aiton) seedlings were planted. In 1987, herbicide was applied to reduce vegetative competition. In the fall of 1989, a combined primary and secondary papermill sludge was operationally applied with a rate of 40 Mg ha^–1 (dry sludge). Actual loading rates varied considerably. Study plots were established in sludge-harvest, control-harvest, and uncut forest zones. Soils within the treatment zones consisted of Typic Haplorthods developed from loamy basal tills. Selected soil and soil solution properties were measured in 1989 and 1990. In 1989, harvest area forest floor pH was 0.6 to 0.8 units higher, and organic matter content was up to 40% lower, when compared with that of the uncut forest area. This reflected the accelerated decomposition of the forest floor as a result of the harvest activities. Sludge application further increased forest floor pH by approximately one unit, exchangeable Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ by 100 and 60%, respectively, cation-exchange capacity by 60%, and base saturation by 34% compared with that of the control-harvest area. Exchangeable Mg²⁺ and Na⁺, and water-soluble SO^2–₄ were the mineral soil properties most affected by sludge application. Harvesting increased concentrations of major nutrients in soil solution. In 1989, solution Ca²⁺ was two to three times greater, and Mg²⁺ was three to six times greater in the harvest area than in the uncut forest area. Flushes of Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Na⁺, and SO^2–₄ into soil solution occurred immediately following sludge application. Only N⁺ and SO^2–₄ remained elevated in 1990, being five and three times greater, respectively, in the sludge amended harvest area than in the uncut forest area. Compared with the harvest operations, one-time papermill sludge application appeared to have only small effects on the biogeochemical processes of the treated Letter E site.